Software Reviews - Thebusinessdive

Full ClickUp review Visit ClickUp

Wrike

4.5/5

Wrike is a powerful AI-powered project and task management platform built for teams managing complex workflows. It combines project management, resource planning, automation, reporting, and collaboration in one workspace.

Visit Wrike

Best AI task manager for complex workflows

Quick verdict

Best AI task manager for:

Teams managing complex projects and cross-functional workflows

Not ideal if:

You want a simple task management app with an easy learning curve

Biggest strength:

Extensive customization and resource management tools

Main tradeoff:

Its large number of features can make it harder for beginners to learn

Why I recommend Wrike for complex workflows

Wrike stands out when you need more than basic task lists. Its combination of task management, resource planning, workload tracking, automation, and reporting gives teams more control over complex projects and workflows.

The resource management tools are particularly useful for teams working across multiple projects. You can track workload, time, and budgets to get a better understanding of how your team’s capacity is being used.

I also like how much flexibility Wrike gives you when organizing work. You can customize dashboards, use different project views, and connect related work across tasks, subtasks, folders, milestones, phases, and projects with cross-tagging.

Collaboration is another strong point. Comments, mentions, approvals, and shared dashboards make it easier for different teams and stakeholders to stay aligned throughout a project.

The main drawback is that all this functionality comes with a learning curve. Some advanced features are also limited to the more expensive plans, which may make Wrike difficult to justify for smaller teams.

Standout features

Resource management: Wrike goes beyond basic workload tracking with tools for managing time, budgets, and resource allocation.

Custom dashboards: You can customize dashboards to track plans, project progress, workloads, and analytics in one place.

Cross-tagging: You can connect tasks and other work items across different workflows without duplicating them.

Automation and recurring workflows: Wrike lets you create rules based on triggers and actions to automate recurring processes. You can also use request forms to collect information and automatically route work into the right workflow.

My Key Takeaways After Using Wrike

What impressed me	Why it made a difference
Resource management	Helps teams track workload, time, budgets, and resource allocation across projects.
Custom dashboards	Provides a clear overview of plans, progress, and analytics in one place.
Cross-functional collaboration	Comments, mentions, approvals, and cross-tagging make it easier for different teams to work together.
400+ integrations	Makes it easier to connect Wrike with the other tools your team already uses.

What I’d improve	Who it could affect
Learning curve	Beginners may need more time to become comfortable with the platform.
Advanced features are expensive	Smaller teams may struggle to justify the higher-priced plans.
Interface complexity	Users looking for a simple task manager may find Wrike unnecessarily complicated.

Pricing plans

Free plan available, as well as a 14-day free trial
Team plan: $10/user/month
Business plan: $25/user/month
Pinnacle plan: Custom pricing
Apex plan: Custom pricing

Try Wrike

ClickUp

4.3/5

ClickUp is an AI-powered project and task management platform that combines tasks, documents, collaboration, time tracking, and AI in one workspace. Its extensive customization and collaboration features make it particularly useful for teams working remotely or across hybrid setups.

Best AI Task manager app for remote and hybrid teams

Quick verdict

Best AI task manager for:

Remote and hybrid teams that need an all-in-one workspace

Not ideal if:

You prefer a simple, lightweight task management tool

Biggest strength:

Extensive collaboration features and workspace flexibility

Main tradeoff:

Steep learning curve and occasional performance issues

Why I recommend ClickUp for remote and hybrid teams

After using ClickUp daily for three months, I found it to be one of the most feature-rich project management tools I tested. It combines task management, documents, communication, time tracking, and AI, so remote teams can keep much of their work in one place.

The collaboration features are what make ClickUp particularly suitable for remote and hybrid teams. You can work together through Docs, Whiteboards, Chat, comments, and real-time editing, while also creating tasks directly from conversations.

I also liked the flexibility of its project management tools. You can customize dashboards, switch between different views, and use workload, box, and team views to understand how work is distributed across your team.

ClickUp’s AI features add another useful layer for distributed teams. ClickUp Brain can help with workspace questions, content creation, and meeting transcription, while the AI note-taker can summarize meetings and turn action items into trackable tasks.

The main downside is the learning curve. ClickUp can feel overwhelming if you only need basic task management, and I also experienced occasional slowdowns with heavier features. The mobile app has some bugs as well.

Standout features

Whiteboards: ClickUp’s interactive Whiteboards let remote teams brainstorm, add tasks, documents, images, and notes, and collaborate in real time.

ClickUp Chat: Teams can discuss work, share documents, and create tasks directly from messages, keeping communication connected to project work.

AI meeting note-taker: ClickUp transcribes and summarizes Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and Google Meet calls and can turn action items into trackable tasks.

Collaborative Docs: Teams can create wikis, knowledge bases, and other documents together with real-time editing and customizable content.

My Key Takeaways After Using ClickUp

What impressed me	Why it made a difference
Collaboration tools	Docs, Whiteboards, Chat, and comments keep team communication and project work connected.
All-in-one workspace	Teams can manage tasks, projects, documents, communication, time tracking, and AI in one platform.
AI note-taking	Meeting summaries and automatically created action items can reduce manual follow-up after calls.
Workspace flexibility	Custom dashboards, project views, and workflows make it easier to adapt ClickUp to different team setups.

What I’d improve	Who it could affect
Learning curve	New users may need time to understand the large number of available features.
Performance	Teams using heavier features may occasionally experience slowdowns or glitches.
Mobile experience	Users who work primarily from their phones may find the mobile app less polished than the desktop version.

Pricing plans

Free plan available
Unlimited plan: $7/user per month when billed annually
Business plan: $12/user per month when billed annually
Enterprise plan: Custom pricing

Read my full review: My Honest ClickUp Review After Using It For +3 Months (2026)

Try ClickUp

Todoist

4.3/5

Todoist is a fast and intuitive task management app designed to keep personal and professional tasks organized. It combines quick task capture, recurring tasks, natural language input, customization, and cross-platform sync in a simple interface.

Full Todoist review Visit Todoist

Best AI task manager for simple task management

Bottom line

Best AI task manager for:

Individuals and small teams who want a simple, fast, and reliable task manager

Not ideal if:

You need advanced project management or fully automated time blocking

Biggest strength:

Fast task capture and intuitive organization

Main tradeoff:

Limited project management and calendar capabilities

Why I recommend Todoist for simple task management

After using Todoist for more than three years and creating over 1,400 tasks, I found that its biggest strength is how quickly it lets you capture and organize work. Adding a task takes seconds, while labels, priorities, subtasks, reminders, and recurring tasks give you enough structure without making the system complicated.

Natural language input is probably my favorite feature. I could type tasks naturally, including dates, times, and recurring schedules, and Todoist would turn them into properly structured tasks automatically. This made task capture much faster and helped me stay in the flow.

I also liked how well Todoist works across different devices. Fast syncing between web, desktop, and mobile means I can access the same tasks wherever I am, while integrations with calendars and other productivity tools make it easier to fit Todoist into an existing workflow.

Todoist is also becoming more AI-focused. Pro users can access its AI assistant for workload management and scheduling suggestions, while the app already uses smart features such as natural language input and AI-generated custom filters.

Standout features

Natural language input: Type tasks the way you normally speak, and Todoist automatically recognizes dates, times, priorities, and recurring schedules.

Recurring tasks: Tasks can repeat automatically on custom schedules, making Todoist particularly useful for routines and recurring responsibilities.

Custom filters: You can create highly specific task views based on priorities, due dates, labels, and other criteria, including by describing the filter in plain English.

Cross-platform sync: Todoist works across web, desktop, and mobile with fast syncing, while integrations with calendars and other productivity tools keep tasks connected to the rest of your workflow.

My Key Takeaways After Using Todoist

What impressed me	Why it made a difference
Fast task capture	Adding and organizing tasks takes seconds without interrupting my workflow.
Natural language input	I could describe tasks naturally and let Todoist handle dates, times, and recurring schedules.
Cross-platform experience	Tasks stayed synced across desktop, web, and mobile, making Todoist easy to use anywhere.
Customization	Labels, filters, priorities, colors, and sections let me adapt Todoist without making it complicated.

What I’d improve	Who it could affect
Limited time blocking	Users who want automatic calendar scheduling may prefer tools like Motion or Reclaim AI.
Basic project management	Teams working with complex projects, dependencies, or advanced workflows may need a more powerful tool.
Some advanced features are paid	Users on the Free plan won’t get access to features such as the Calendar layout and AI assistant.

Pricing plans

Free plan available, as well as a 7-day free trial
Pro plan: $5/user per month when billed annually
Business plan: $8/user per month when billed annually

Read my full review: My Honest Todoist Review After 3 Years & 1,400 Tasks

Try Todoist

Taskade

4.3/5

Taskade is an AI-first productivity and task management platform that combines projects, tasks, collaboration, automation, and AI agents in one workspace.

Full Taskade review Visit Taskade

Best AI task manager for AI-powered workflows and automation

Review Summary

Best AI task manager for:

Teams and individuals who want AI agents, automation, and lightweight project management in one place

Not ideal if:

You need advanced project management or a deep knowledge management system

Biggest strength:

Powerful AI agents and workflow automation

Main tradeoff:

Limited project management and note-taking depth

Why I recommend Taskade for AI-powered workflows

After using Taskade for several weeks, I found it different from most task management tools I tested. It combines tasks, projects, notes, collaboration, automation, and AI in a single workspace without feeling overly complicated.

The biggest reason I’d recommend it is its AI agents. These aren’t just chatbots – you can train them with instructions, workspace data, files, and web sources, then use them for different parts of your workflow. I found it impressive for automating tasks such as project planning, content creation, and research.

Taskade’s automation is another standout. You can create detailed trigger-and-action workflows and connect them with tools such as Slack, Google Sheets, and WordPress. During testing, I particularly liked how much control I had over what happens after a trigger.

The newer Genesis AI App Builder takes this even further. Instead of manually building a workflow, you can describe what you want and Taskade generates the structure, including tasks, workflows, automations, and AI agents. The generated setups still need some adjustments, but they can save considerable time.

The main limitation is that Taskade remains a lightweight project management tool. It lacks some of the advanced project management and knowledge management features you’ll find in more specialized platforms.

Standout features

AI agents: Build custom AI agents trained on your instructions, files, and workspace data to handle tasks across different workflows.

AI App Builder (Genesis): Describe a system you need, and Taskade can generate its tasks, workflows, automations, and AI agents for you.

Automation: Create detailed trigger-and-action workflows and connect them with external tools such as Slack, Google Sheets, and WordPress.

AI document chat: Upload files and ask Taskade’s AI questions about them or have it summarize their contents directly inside your project.

My Key Takeaways After Using Taskade

What impressed me	Why it made a difference
AI agents	They can be customized for specific workflows instead of being limited to simple chatbot interactions.
Automation	Detailed triggers and actions make it possible to automate repetitive processes across Taskade and other apps.
AI-generated workflows	Genesis can create entire project structures from a simple description, reducing setup time.
Ease of use	Despite its AI capabilities, I found the interface intuitive and learned most of the features within a few hours.

What I’d improve	Who it could affect
Project management depth	Teams managing complex projects may need more advanced reporting and resource management.
Note-taking	Users looking for a full knowledge management system may find Taskade too limited compared with Notion or Obsidian.
AI-generated setups need refinement	Genesis can save time, but the workflows it creates aren’t always perfect and may require adjustments.

Pricing plans

Free plan available, and a 7-day free trial
Pro plan: $10/user per month when billed annually
Business plan: $25/user per month when billed annually
Max plan: $100/user per month when billed annually
Enterprise plan: $250/user per month when billed annually

Read my full review: Taskade Review: I Nearly Spit Out My Coffee (2026)

Try Taskade

Motion

4.1/5

Motion is an AI-powered productivity platform that combines task management, project management, calendar management, and meeting scheduling. Its biggest strength is automatically planning and rescheduling your work around your availability, priorities, and existing commitments.

Full Motion review Visit Motion

Best AI Task Manager App For Scheduling Tasks and Meetings

Bottom line

Best AI task manager for:

Busy professionals and teams who want AI to plan and optimize their day

Not ideal if:

You need advanced project management and reporting features

Biggest strength:

Powerful AI scheduling and automatic task rescheduling

Main tradeoff:

High pricing and limited project management depth

Why I recommend Motion for scheduling tasks and meetings

What makes Motion different from most task managers is that it doesn’t just store your to-do list. It actively plans when you should complete your work. After adding tasks, Motion schedules them around your availability, priorities, working hours, meetings, and personal commitments.

I found the auto-scheduling feature to be the most impressive part of Motion. If a task takes longer than expected or something unexpected comes up, Motion can automatically rearrange your schedule based on your priorities and available time.

Its calendar is another major advantage. Motion brings Google Calendar, Apple Calendar, and Outlook Calendar into one view, making it easier to see personal and work commitments alongside your tasks.

The meeting scheduler complements this well. You can create personalized booking pages with availability rules, buffer times, and meeting limits, reducing the back-and-forth involved in finding a suitable time.

Motion also goes beyond scheduling with AI note-taking, an AI docs assistant, and AI Employees. These features can turn meeting notes, documents, and ideas into actionable tasks and help automate repetitive work.

The main drawback is that Motion isn’t designed to replace a full-scale project management platform. Its project management features are useful for smaller teams, but it lacks the advanced reporting and project management depth found in more specialized tools.

Standout features

AI auto-scheduling: Motion automatically finds time for tasks based on your priorities, availability, and existing commitments, then reschedules unfinished work when plans change.

Unified calendar: Google, Apple, and Outlook calendars can be managed from one centralized view alongside your tasks and projects.

Meeting scheduler: Personalized booking links let you control availability, buffer times, meeting limits, and preferred meeting slots.

AI Employees: Customizable AI assistants can analyze your notes and documents, generate action items, draft emails, and create project plans based on your workflows.

My Key Takeaways After Using Motion

What impressed me	Why it made a difference
AI auto-scheduling	Motion takes the manual work out of deciding when tasks should be completed.
Automatic rescheduling	When plans change, unfinished tasks can be moved automatically instead of requiring manual replanning.
Calendar integration	Combining work and personal calendars made it easier to plan realistic days.
All-in-one approach	Tasks, projects, calendars, meetings, and AI features are managed in one platform.

What I’d improve	Who it could affect
Pricing	Individuals and small teams on a budget may find Motion expensive.
Project management depth	Teams managing complex projects may need a more specialized PM tool.
Learning curve	New users may need some time to configure schedules, booking pages, and other features.
Mobile experience	Users who rely heavily on mobile may find the experience less complete than desktop.

Pricing plans

No free plan available, only a 7-day free trial
Pro AI plan: $29/month per user when billed annually
Business AI plan: $39/month per user when billed annually
Pro AI for teams: $19/seat/month when billed annually
Business AI for teams: $29/seat/month when billed annually
Enterprise: Custom pricing

Read my full review: Motion App Review: My $348 Experience and Why I Don’t Regret It

Try Motion

Hive

4.3/5

Hive is a user-friendly AI project and task management platform built around collaboration, communication, and workflow automation. It combines tasks, projects, chat, email, notes, dashboards, and AI tools in one workspace.

Full Hive review Visit Hive

Best AI task manager for easy team collaboration

Quick verdict

Best AI task manager for:

Small and mid-sized teams that want simple project management and built-in communication

Not ideal if:

You need deep customization or advanced enterprise-level workflows

Biggest strength:

Easy-to-use collaboration and communication features

Main tradeoff:

Some advanced features are locked behind higher-tier plans

Why I recommend Hive for easy team collaboration

What stood out to me most about Hive was how easily it combines project management with team communication. You can assign tasks, comment on work, share files, edit documents together, and use direct or group messaging without switching between different apps.

I also found Hive easy to learn. Despite offering a solid range of project management and AI features, the interface has a short learning curve, so teams can start organizing projects without spending too much time configuring the platform.

The customizable dashboards and workspace add-ons give teams some flexibility without making the platform feel overly complicated. You can tailor dashboards, add goals, choose different project views, and add tools such as time tracking or forms when you need them.

Hive’s AI features are another advantage. Buzz can answer questions, create projects, automate workflows, and even build widgets and dashboards, while AI in Notes can help with content creation.

The main limitation is that some of the more advanced features are locked behind the Teams plan or paid add-ons, so smaller teams may need to upgrade to get the full experience.

Standout features

Built-in communication: Hive combines project work with instant messaging, collaborative documents, comments, and project updates, keeping team communication in one workspace.

AI assistant: Hive’s Buzz AI assistant can answer questions, create projects, automate workflows, and generate widgets or dashboards.

Custom dashboards: You can combine widgets, filters, charts, goals, notes, and external embeds to create dashboards tailored to your team’s needs.

Time tracking: Hive automatically records time spent on tasks and lets you filter and export time-tracking results, making it useful for monitoring project effort.

My Key Takeaways After Using Hive

What impressed me	Why it made a difference
Ease of use	Hive has a short learning curve while still offering a solid range of project management features.
Collaboration	Messaging, comments, collaborative documents, and project updates keep distributed teams connected.
AI tools	Buzz can assist with projects, workflows, widgets, and dashboards rather than just answering questions.
Workspace flexibility	Views, dashboards, templates, and add-ons make it easy to adapt Hive to different workflows.

What I’d improve	Who it could affect
Advanced features are plan-dependent	Teams needing time tracking, resourcing, or unlimited advanced tools may need the Teams plan.
Project views	Power users looking for a very large selection of project views may find Hive less flexible than Monday.com.
AI in email	Users who rely on email workflows may miss having Hive’s AI capabilities integrated into the email feature.

Pricing plans

Free plan available, and a 14-day free trial
Starter plan: $5/user/month when billed annually
Teams plan: $12/user/month when billed annually
Enterprise plan: Custom pricing

Read my full review: Hive Review: The Best Project Management App? (2025)

Try Hive

Explore our Apps directory

A curated directory of software tools we’ve independently reviewed, with links to full reviews, comparisons, and category guides.

Explore Apps directory

Reclaim AI

4/5

Reclaim is an AI scheduling and task management app that automatically finds time for tasks, meetings, habits, and focus work. It is designed to protect your priorities while keeping your schedule flexible as plans change.

Full Reclaim AI review Visit Reclaim AI

Best AI task manager for work-life balance

Bottom line

Best AI task manager for:

Busy professionals who want to protect focus time, habits, and personal time

Not ideal if:

You need a mobile or desktop app or broad integrations

Biggest strength:

AI scheduling combined with habits and focus-time protection

Main tradeoff:

Web-only experience and limited integrations

Why I recommend Reclaim for work-life balance

What makes Reclaim different from a traditional task manager is how much emphasis it puts on protecting your time. Instead of simply listing tasks, it automatically finds space for them in your calendar based on their priority, duration, and your availability.

I particularly like the Habits feature. You can schedule recurring activities such as exercise, lunch, or focus time, and Reclaim automatically moves them when your calendar changes. This makes it easier to maintain routines without having to constantly rearrange your schedule manually.

Reclaim also works well if you already use another project management tool. You can connect apps such as Todoist, Asana, Jira, ClickUp, and Google Tasks, allowing Reclaim to pull your tasks into the calendar and automatically find time to complete them.

Its Smart Meetings and scheduling links are useful for reducing scheduling back-and-forth. Reclaim can find suitable times across participants’ schedules while taking existing priorities and calendar commitments into account.

Standout features

AI task scheduling: Reclaim automatically finds time for tasks based on their priority, duration, and your availability, then reschedules them when plans change.

Habits: You can protect recurring activities such as exercise, breaks, or focus time, with Reclaim automatically moving them when your calendar changes.

Smart Meetings: Reclaim finds suitable times for recurring meetings across everyone’s schedules, reducing the need for manual coordination.

Time tracking and analytics: Reclaim tracks focus time, meetings, buffer time, and work-life balance trends, giving you a clearer picture of how your time is actually being spent.

My Key Takeaways After Using Reclaim

What impressed me	Why it made a difference
Work-life balance	Reclaim protects focus time, personal activities, and recurring habits alongside work commitments.
Automatic rescheduling	Tasks and habits can move automatically when your schedule changes, reducing manual planning.
Easy task management	You can add tasks quickly and let Reclaim decide when they should happen.
Simple meeting scheduling	Scheduling links and Smart Meetings remove much of the back-and-forth involved in finding a time.

What I’d improve	Who it could affect
No mobile or desktop app	Users who want to manage their schedules primarily from dedicated apps may find the web-only experience limiting.
Limited integrations	Teams relying on a broad range of third-party tools may find Reclaim less flexible than competitors.
Habits can linger	Stopped habits may continue appearing in your Google or Outlook calendar.

Pricing plans

Free plan available, as well as a 14-day free trial
Starter: $10/user/month when billed annually
Business: $15/user/month when billed annually
Enterprise: $22/user/month when billed annually

Read my full review: Honest Reclaim AI Review | An Unreal Advantage? (2026)

Try Reclaim AI

TimeHero

4.2/5

TimeHero is an AI-powered task and scheduling platform that automatically plans work around your availability, deadlines, meetings, and priorities. It also adds workload management, forecasting, and risk detection, making it particularly useful for teams managing multiple projects.

Visit TimeHero

Best AI task manager for team scheduling and workload management

Bottom line

Best AI task manager for:

Teams that need automated scheduling and visibility into workloads and project risks

Not ideal if:

You want a simple personal planner or a highly visual project management tool

Biggest strength:

Automatic scheduling combined with workload management and forecasting

Main tradeoff:

No permanent free plan and a weaker cross-platform experience

Why I recommend TimeHero for team scheduling and workload management

TimeHero goes beyond automatically scheduling individual tasks. It continuously adjusts your team’s work based on availability, priorities, deadlines, and changes to meetings or workloads. This makes it useful for teams where schedules are constantly shifting.

Its workload management features are another major strength. You can quickly see overloaded team members, projects that are falling behind, and tasks that are at risk of missing their deadlines. Forecasting tools also help teams create more realistic project estimates and priorities.

I also liked the workflow automation. Reusable templates, recurring projects, task dependencies, and shared folders make it easier to organize ongoing team workflows without rebuilding them from scratch.

TimeHero also connects with a wide range of productivity and project management tools, including Google Calendar, Outlook, Asana, ClickUp, Slack, Todoist, and Jira. This makes it easier to bring tasks from your existing tools into an automatically planned schedule.

The main drawbacks are the lack of a permanent free plan, limited features on the Basic plan, and some difficulty finding older tasks and projects. The platform can also feel more focused on structured team workflows than simple personal planning.

Standout features

Automated scheduling: TimeHero automatically schedules tasks around your availability, deadlines, meetings, and priorities, then adjusts the plan when circumstances change.

Workload management: Workload and forecasting tools help identify overloaded team members, projects falling behind, and deadlines that may be at risk.

Workflow templates: Reusable templates and recurring workflows make it faster to set up projects and repeatable team processes.

Risk detection: TimeHero flags tasks that are scheduled too close to their deadlines, helping teams identify potential problems before they become missed deadlines.

My Key Takeaways After Using TimeHero

What impressed me	Why it made a difference
Automatic scheduling	Tasks are continuously planned and adjusted around availability, priorities, and deadlines.
Workload visibility	Managers can quickly see overloaded team members and projects that may be falling behind.
Forecasting	Project forecasts help teams create more realistic expectations around deadlines and workload.
Workflow templates	Reusable templates and recurring projects speed up the setup of repeatable workflows.
Integrations	TimeHero connects with major productivity and project management tools, making it easier to bring existing tasks into its scheduling system.

What I’d improve	Who it could affect
No permanent free plan	Individuals and small teams looking for a free long-term solution will need to look elsewhere.
Basic plan limitations	Teams that need advanced workflow and reporting features may need to upgrade.
Task discovery	Users with many projects may sometimes find it difficult to locate older tasks and projects.
Cross-platform experience	Users who rely heavily on native mobile or desktop apps may find TimeHero less flexible than competitors.

Pricing plans

No free plan available, only a 7-day free trial
Basic plan: $4.60/user/month
Professional plan: $10/user/month
Premium plan: $22/user/month

Try TimeHero

Summary

AI task managers can do much more than organize to-do lists. They can prioritize work, automate repetitive tasks, build schedules, and help teams coordinate their workload more efficiently.

The key is choosing a tool that fits the way you actually work. Some apps focus on AI scheduling, while others are built around project management, automation, or simple task organization. Integrations, customization, security, and pricing are also important when deciding which tool is worth using.

After testing 15+ AI task management apps, I found that there isn’t one tool that works best for everyone. The right choice depends on your workflow, team size, and the type of work you want AI to handle.

Why you can trust our reviews

Our mission? No fluff, no shortcuts—just honest, hands-on insights from productivity pros.

Have a question or suggestion? I’d love to hear from you. Feel free to reach out anytime at aronkantor@thebusinessdive.com.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is an AI task manager?

An AI task manager is a task management tool that uses AI to help with task creation, prioritization, scheduling, and automation. More advanced AI-powered task management apps can also support project planning, team collaboration, and other project management processes.

Can AI project management tools replace traditional project management software?

Not always. Some AI project management tools are designed for complex projects and include advanced features such as resource management, project scheduling, and workload tracking. Others focus mainly on everyday tasks and automation. The best AI project management tool depends on how much project management your workflow requires.

How can using AI improve project management?

Using AI can help teams automate routine tasks, prioritize work, and improve project planning. AI can also analyze large amounts of data to support resource allocation and provide data-driven insights for better decision-making. This can help project teams spend less time on repetitive tasks and more time on higher-value work.

How much do AI task management tools cost?

AI project management tools can cost as little as $0 per month when a free plan is available, while paid options typically range from around $5 to $50 per month depending on the platform and plan. Pricing is often listed per user per month, with more advanced features available on higher-tier plans.

What should I look for in an AI task management tool?

Look for the AI capabilities that match your workflow, such as natural language task creation, automated scheduling, workflow automation, and resource management. You should also consider the user interface, integrations with third-party apps, team collaboration features, pricing, and whether the tool can handle your project management needs as your team and projects grow.

Disclosure: I only recommend products I would use myself, and all opinions expressed here are our own. This post may contain affiliate links through which, at no additional cost to you, I may earn a small commission. Read the full privacy policy here.

Hey there! I am Aron, the founder of Thebusinessdive. I have been testing productivity apps for almost three years now. I reach 25.000 -50.000 people monthly with the mission to help you find the perfect productivity apps. Subscribe to my YouTube channel, newsletter, and social media to hear more about the best productivity tools. Let’s dive in!

The post Best 9 AI Task Manager Tools to Get More Work Done appeared first on .

Monday.com Review 2026: Is the $228 Price Tag Justified?

Aron Kantor — Sat, 08 Aug 2026 14:19:45 +0000

Monday.com is one of the most popular project management tools on the market. Still, after testing it against 20+ alternatives, I asked myself: Is its $228 yearly price tag actually justified for its Pro plan?

In this Monday.com review, I’ll break down what actually stood out during testing, where the platform feels worth the price, where it didn’t meet my expectations, and give you a no-fluff answer if it’s for you or you should skip.

Let’s dive in!

Verdict

Here’s the quick verdict if you don’t want to read the full review:

Best for: Teams that want a simple, visual, easy-to-use project management tool
Not ideal for: Power users needing deep customization or budget-friendly pricing
Biggest strength: Best-in-class UI and dashboards
Biggest weakness: Expensive compared to many competitors

Verdict: Monday.com is one of the most user-friendly project management tools on the market, but its pricing makes it harder to justify for some teams.
Score: 4.2 / 5

Tested with our review & scoring methodology Real-world testing Unbiased evaluation

Monday.com

Review

Project & task management features

Collaboration & teamwork

Automation & workflows

Customization & flexibility

Reporting & analytics

Integrations

User interface

Performance & reliability

Pricing

My experience

Summary

Monday.com is an intuitive project management platform mostly for teams, but individuals can also utilize its free version. Ultimately, I had a positive experience with Monday.com, and the higher-tier plans have all the features a small business might need to manage projects.

4.2

pros

	Intuitive user interface
	Great task management features
	Customizable dashboard
	Many view options for projects
	An easy-to-use software

cons

	Recurring tasks
	Buggy mobile app
	Expensive

How We Test Project Management Tools

We score every project management tool using this weighted framework based on hands-on testing and real use cases.

Our scoring breakdown after testing 20+ project management apps:

Features & functionality — 60%
User interface — 10%
Performance & Reliability —10%
Pricing — 10%
Real-world experience — 10%

Want a detailed breakdown of how we test each category?

Learn exactly how we test tools → Review methodology

Short on time? Here’s a quick overview of Monday.com

What is Monday.com?

Monday.com is an intuitive project management platform mostly for teams, but individuals can also utilize its free version. Thanks to its security measures and integration options, Monday.com is ideal for enterprises as well.

With this project management tool, you can create workflows, automate processes, and collaborate on projects with your team members.

You can use Monday.com on the web and on your desktop for both Mac and Windows, and offers mobile apps for iOS and Android devices.

What using Monday.com felt like after testing 20+ alternatives

In this video, I show you how to get started with Monday, so you can decide more easily if this project management app is for you.

Compared to more robust project management apps like Jira or ClickUp, Monday has a significantly faster learning curve. Monday.com’s task management tools are easy to use, and you can customize the columns and parameters easily.

When testing, I particularly enjoyed using Monday.com’s project views. It offers a wide range of options for reviewing your projects from different angles.

Furthermore, the fully customizable dashboard stood out to me during my Monday.com review. Using its dashboard, you can utilize various widgets and apps to track your projects.

Nonetheless, I ran into a few bugs while testing the mobile app, and there were also some missing features I genuinely expected to find in a project management tool at Monday.com’s price point.

Why Monday.com didn’t score higher (and where it loses points)

Monday.com lost points in pricing (2.5/5) due to its relatively high cost, and in reliability (3.5/5), mainly because of occasional bugs in the mobile app.

Where it truly stood out during testing and earned the maximum score was in its advanced reporting, extensive integrations, and highly intuitive user interface.

Who Monday.com is a good fit for

Teams that want a simple, visual, and easy-to-use project management tool
Small to mid-sized businesses looking for a fast onboarding and short learning curve
Teams that rely on dashboards, reporting, and multiple project views to track progress
Users who value a clean UI and intuitive workflow over deep complexity
Teams that need solid collaboration features without heavy setup

Who Monday.com is not ideal for

Power users who need deep customization and advanced workflow logic
Teams managing highly complex or technical projects (e.g., dev-heavy workflows)
Users looking for a budget-friendly project management app
Users who rely heavily on mobile apps (due to occasional bugs)

The features that mattered during testing

These were the parts of Monday.com I relied on most while testing it.

Home page

Whenever I test project management tools, I always love to take a look at the home page, as it can provide a quick overview of your projects and tasks. So, a good home page or dashboard can save time and give you the comfort of knowing what you need to deal with today.

Monday.com’s home page is more like a workspace overview that shows your recent projects and gives you quick access to your content, collaborators, and permissions. If you want to get a better overview of your tasks, you need to go to the My Work tab.

Here, you can view your assigned tasks in a table or calendar view and customize the information displayed using options such as people, boards, status, date, and priority.

Nevertheless, I discovered during my Monday.com review that other software like ClickUp or Asana provides more options to customize your home page. Monday.com offers such customization and a more detailed dashboard view under your workspaces, but I will talk about it later.

Now, let’s move on to Monday.com’s project management tools!

Project management software

With Monday.com, you can organize your projects into several workspaces. When creating a project, you can decide whether you need a new workspace for it or if you want to involve it in an existing one.

I was honestly surprised by how fast the setup process was. I could usually create a new project from scratch and start organizing tasks in around five minutes.

You need to select the column types you want to include and the project view you want to apply.

Once you are done with it, you can start adding your tasks and their parameters. Let’s talk about the view options for a minute.

Monday.com offers many view options to visualize your projects from different aspects. You can use Gantt, Kanban, calendar, timeline, workload, chart, files gallery, map, form, cards, and pivot board views. You can add more views through the plus icon or the Views Center, with up to 100 board views per board!

I ended up using the Kanban, and workload views the most. The Gantt view looked polished, but for smaller projects, it felt unnecessary for me.

I believe this project management software provides more project views than most of the ones I tried. It is also great that the views do not take too much time to load and that new project view options are added regularly.

For teams, the workload view could be very helpful in reviewing resource allocation. As I work alone, it is not that suggestive, but it can clearly represent how the workload is allocated in your team.

Furthermore, Enterprise customers can create portfolios, where you can get a holistic view of all your projects in one place.

One thing I liked was how quickly I could restructure workflows. Using Monday.com’s project views, I rebuilt my content pipeline for the next few months in about 20–30 minutes.

Templates

Monday.com offers some templates for different industries and teams. Using such ready-made templates, you can create projects even faster.

Overall, I loved that there are plenty of templates, and you can easily personalize them. Just a quick side note: maybe it is just me, but to access the templates, Monday.com loaded at least a few minutes.

Task management features

During my Monday.com review, I realized how easy it is to add and assign tasks to others. You can add a new task with one click and select its status, priority level, timeline, owner, and due date.

In addition, Monday.com allows you to drag and drop individual tasks and move them irrespective of the view option you use.

I liked that that you can create more columns to track your tasks effectively. Furthermore, you can customize the label or create your own.

Once you have created a task, you can add subitems to break down more complex tasks. As you can see, I added 5 subtasks to my main task called AI note-takers YT video. If you click on the task, it will show the additional tasks under this item.

After reviewing Monday.com’s task management tools, I was satisfied, but not perfect. Something that annoyed me repeatedly is that recurring tasks are handled through automation rather than as a dedicated task function.

You can create recurring tasks using Monday.com’s automation, including setting them to repeat daily, weekly, or on a custom schedule.

Custom dashboard

Custom dashboards are useful for displaying the key information of all your projects in a single layout. You can apply up to 30 widgets and apps here so you can understand better the project progress, workloads, budgets, and more.

This is exactly what I expected from a good dashboard view, and this is what I missed on the home page. Overall, the customized dashboard was one of the best project management tools I discovered during my Monday.com review.

Collaboration tools

You can invite your team members to your workspace and start working on projects right away. The first step to getting your team onboard and collaborating is to add them as owners to the tasks.

You can start discussions in your projects, mention others, attach files, and leave comments. Furthermore, you can do the same under each task.

Another useful team collaboration feature is the update feed. Using this Monday.com feature, you get notified when someone mentions or assigns a task to you.

Lastly, you can share projects with your team members and change the permission level to a member, admin, or viewer.

Ultimately, Monday.com has decent team collaboration tools. It has all the essential features a project management tool needs to organize a team’s work.

Automation

You can manage and create custom automation with Monday.com. The automation feature is quite an intuitive and simple tool.

You only need to select the criteria for when the automation should be triggered and the required action in such cases. Depending on the trigger you’ve picked, you might need to select a condition as well.

Docs

Using Monday.com, you can create and draft documents. You can either start from scratch or use a template.

You can add numerous types of formats, such as text, tables, widgets, lists, and more. Furthermore, you can use Monday.com’s AI Sidekick to create a workdoc, generate and refine text, and summarize the text or the entire document.

During my Monday.com review, I found this an easy-to-use tool, which is completely ideal for creating a company knowledge base or writing meeting notes.

Time tracking

When adding columns to your projects, you can select the time-tracking tool as well. Once you add it to your tasks, you only need to hit the start button, and that is. However, the Time Tracking Column is available on the Pro and Enterprise plans.

If you need to export the time tracking column to Excel, you only need to click the column title and select “Export Column Data to Excel.” With this, you can collect the time you spend on each task and report it easily.

I think such a tracking feature is sufficient for most people. If you need more advanced time tracking, I typically recommend using a dedicated app for this, as it can give you a much more detailed breakdown of how you manage your time.

AI features

I was curious whether Monday’s newer AI tools were actually useful or just marketing. Monday.com has started putting much more focus on AI, which is now integrated directly into boards, workflows, docs, and automations.

One feature I found interesting is AI Blocks. These can be added to automations and workflows to perform actions like summarizing text, generating content, translating text, detecting sentiment, assigning labels, or pulling key details from documents.

Monday.com also offers AI Sidekick. This works like an assistant inside the platform. You can use it to write updates, summarize discussions, generate content, create workdocs, and take actions such as updating work or creating boards and other items.

AI Workflows let you build multi-step, cross-board workflows with AI-powered actions. You can use AI-powered blocks such as Sidekick, web search, and agents within the workflow builder.

For more specialized tasks, AI Agents can work across teams and workflows based on instructions and context. You can build and customize these agents using prompts without coding.

Monday Vibe takes a different approach, acting as an AI-powered app builder that lets you create custom applications from natural-language instructions. Meanwhile, AI Notetaker can transcribe meetings, generate summaries, and extract action items. It can also link summaries and action items to boards, items, and workflows.

However, these features run on AI credits, which are consumed whenever you use them.

Connecting Monday.com with other tools

Monday.com integrates with 850+ third-party apps and integrations, making it surprisingly flexible across different workflows and team setups. I found it easy to connect with the tools I already used without needing much extra setup.

It also supports Zapier integrations, which provide access to thousands of third-party apps and automations if you want to build Monday.com into your tool stack.

Monday.com’s user interface

Monday.com has an incredibly intuitive user interface. It is easy to navigate on it, and you can find all the key features with a few clicks. I love that it is simplified, and I do not have the feeling that it is packed.

Explore our Apps directory

A curated directory of software tools we’ve independently reviewed, with links to full reviews, comparisons, and category guides.

Explore Apps directory

Monday.com’s mobile app

Monday.com has a mobile version that is available for Android and iPhone users as well. Its user interface is okay, but it has fewer features compared to the web and desktop apps. The mobile bug happened when I started adding lots of tasks to one of the projects.

Also, during my testing, I occasionally experienced issues with new items not syncing immediately with the desktop or web app.

Cost vs value

After testing Monday.com, pricing was one of my biggest concerns.

Free plan

Monday.com’s free version has some limitations, and it is only sufficient for individuals or very small teams. With the Free plan, you can access 3 boards, 8 column types, +200 templates, up to 3 docs, and the iOS and Android apps. You can also have up to 2 seats on the Free plan.

Basic plan

Monday.com has four paid plans. Whenever you decide to buy one of the paid plans of Monday.com, you need to know that paid plans start at three seats.

If choosing the Basic plan, you can add unlimited items, access to 5GB file storage, prioritized customer support, and you can create a dashboard based on 1 board. You can also give read-only access to unlimited free viewers.

You can get the Basic plan for $9 monthly per seat if purchasing the annual subscription. If you choose the monthly billing, it is $12 per month per seat.

Based on my experience, this plan might be ideal for small businesses, but lacks some critical features.

Standard plan

With the Standard plan, you can use the timeline, Gantt, and calendar views and access 250 automation and 250 integration actions per month. You also get 2,000 AI credits per month. Additionally, you can create a dashboard that combines five boards and provides 20GB of file storage.

It is $12 per month per seat if billed annually. If you want to pay on a monthly basis, it will cost $14 per month per seat.

Compared to the Basic plan, the Standard plan offers more options to visualize projects, more space for your files, longer activity logs (i.e., 6 months), and access to automation and integrations.

Pro plan

The Pro plan starts at $19 per month per seat if the annual billing is chosen. Otherwise, it is $24 monthly per seat.

With the Pro Plan, you access private boards, chart view, time tracking, formula columns, and 25,000 automation and 25,000 integration actions per month. You can also create a dashboard that combines up to 20 boards.

This plan is excellent for small and mid-sized businesses.

Enterprise plan

Lastly, Monday.com offers an Enterprise plan for larger businesses with custom pricing.

You get enterprise-scale automation and integrations with up to 250,000 automation and 250,000 integration actions per month, enterprise-grade security, advanced reporting and analytics, and enterprise support. AI credits are available with custom quantities for Enterprise customers.

Where Monday.com impressed me (and where it didn’t)

After testing real workflows in Monday.com, these were the biggest strengths and frustrations I noticed.

Where It Excels

Intuitive user interface and a shorter learning curve than other project management tools
It has great task management features with numerous customization options
The customizable dashboard made my workflows more clear
The high number of project views surprised me
An easy-to-use project management software compared to ClickUp, Jira, or SmartSuite

Where It Falls Short

You can not add recurring tasks unless you use automation, which was frustrating when managing my projects
Its mobile app has some bugs, and it’s one of Monday’s biggest pain points
The Pro plan is expensive compared to the depth of features

Monday.com alternatives

If you need something cheaper, more customizable, or better suited for complex workflows, these alternatives are worth considering.

App	Best for	Description
Hive	Best for small teams	A project management app for small teams with advanced collaboration and AI features. Full Hive review \| Quick Hive overview
SmartSuite	Best for no-code workflow building	A collaborative work management solution for teams to track and manage workflow. Full SmartSuite review \| Quick SmartSuite overview
ClickUp	Best all-in-one	An easy-to-use AI-powered project management software. Full ClickUp review \| Quick ClickUp overview
Taskade	Best lightweight AI tool	An AI-powered workflow and lightweight project management app. Full Taskade review \| Quick Taskade overview
Coda	Best for custom workflows	An all-in-one app that is similar to Notion, however, with more massive project management tools. Full Coda review \| Quick Coda overview
Notion	Best for notes & projects	It provides a centralized workspace where you can organize your thoughts, notes, tasks, projects, and documents in one place. Full Notion review \| Quick Notion overview
Motion	Best for AI scheduling	It is an AI calendar app, but it also works as a project management software. Full Motion review \| Quick Motion overview
Asana	Best for ease of use	A popular and easy-to-use project management tool. Full Asana review \| Quick Asana overview
Teamwork.com	Best for client work	An excellent project management software for client-facing teams. Full Teamwork review \| Quick Teamwork overview
Zoho Projects	Best for structured planning	A structured project management tool designed to help teams plan, track, and deliver projects with clear processes and long-term visibility. Full Zoho Projects review \| Quick Zoho Projects overview
ProofHub	Best for approvals & feedback	A project and team management app with outstanding collaboration, proofing, and customization options. Full ProofHub review \| Quick ProofHub overview
Jira	Best for agile teams	An advanced project management and issue tracking tool, built mainly for agile software and IT teams. Full Jira review \| Quick Jira overview
Vaiz	Best lightweight all-in-one	A lightweight project management platform that combines tasks, docs, collaboration, automation, and AI in one workspace. Full Vaiz review \| Quick Vaiz overview

Compare Monday.com vs alternatives

ClickUp VS Monday.com

ClickUp vs Monday

Notion VS Monday.com

Notion vs Monday

Monday.com VS Asana

Monday vs Asana

Teamwork VS Monday.com

Teamwork vs Monday

SmartSuite VS Monday.com

SmartSuite vs Monday

Final verdict: Is Monday.com worth it?

After testing Monday.com against more than 20 project management tools, I can see exactly why so many teams like it. It’s not overwhelming at all to build workflows thanks to its ease of use and polished interface.

What stood out most to me was that I could go from an empty workspace to building up my content schedule and other projects without spending hours configuring everything.

However, Monday.com is expensive for what it offers. It’s nowhere near ClickUp or Jira in terms of feature depth, yet its pricing doesn’t reflect that.

Ultimately, I think Monday.com makes the most sense for teams that value simplicity, clean design, and fast onboarding rather than feature depth.

8 Best Project Management Software in 2026 | My Honest List

Looking for similar tools?

Visit the link to explore other apps we’ve reviewed in this space and how they compare.

See overview

Why you can trust our reviews

Our mission? No fluff, no shortcuts—just honest, hands-on insights from productivity pros.

Discover how we stay transparent, read our review methodology, and let us know about any tools we missed.

Frequently asked questions

Is Monday.com actually good?

After my Monday.com review, I realized that it is quite a good project management tool. It offers numerous view options and customization options, and it is an easy-to-use project management app overall.

Is Monday.com actually free?

Monday.com has a free plan for one or two seats, but it has a limited feature set. With the Free version, you can access 3 boards, 8 column types, +200 templates, up to 3 docs, and the iOS and Android apps.

With the paid plans starting from $9 per user monthly, you can get more advanced features to manage your projects.

What is the difference between ClickUp and Monday.com?

Both ClickUp and Monday.com are fantastic project management tools. As for pricing, ClickUp is more affordable. Nevertheless, Monday.com has a shorter learning curve than ClickUp.

If we take a look at the features of both project management software, I would say ClickUp has more robust tools. However, the customer support team at Monday.com is better than ClickUp.

Disclosure: I only recommend products I would use myself, and all opinions expressed here are our own. This post may contain affiliate links that, at no additional cost to you, may earn a small commission. Read the full privacy policy here.

Full Nutshell review Visit Nutshell

The post Monday.com Review 2026: Is the $228 Price Tag Justified? appeared first on .

Salesforce Alternatives: 6 Better CRM Options for 2026

Aron Kantor — Fri, 07 Aug 2026 21:17:29 +0000

Salesforce CRM is incredibly capable, but many businesses don’t need an enterprise CRM platform to manage their sales process effectively.

If your priority is a more user friendly interface, better sales pipeline management, or affordable CRM software with solid workflow automation, these Salesforce alternatives are the ones I’d recommend:

Nutshell → Best Salesforce alternative for small businesses
HubSpot → Best Salesforce alternative for growing businesses
Pipedrive → Best Salesforce alternative for sales pipeline management
Copper CRM → Best Salesforce alternative for Google Workspace users
Zoho CRM → Best Salesforce alternative for affordable customization
Monday CRM → Best Salesforce alternative for collaborative sales workflows

Best Salesforce Alternatives Compared

If you don’t want to read the entire guide, this comparison table will help you narrow down your options in under a minute.

CRM	Best if you want…	Why switch from Salesforce?	Learning curve	Pricing
Nutshell	A simpler sales CRM	Easier to learn and manage	Easy	From $13/user/month
HubSpot	Sales and marketing in one platform	Easier setup and a generous free plan	Easy	Free + from $10/seat/month
Pipedrive	Better visibility into every deal	Simpler sales pipeline management	Easy	From $14/user/month
Copper	A CRM that works inside Gmail	Native Google Workspace integration	Easy	From $23/user/month
Zoho CRM	Enterprise-style customization for less	Similar flexibility at a lower cost	Moderate	Free + from €14/user/month
Monday CRM	Sales and teamwork in one workspace	Better collaboration across teams	Moderate	From €12/seat/month

How We Chose the Best Salesforce Alternatives

We evaluate every CRM using the same hands-on testing framework we developed after testing 10+ CRM platforms across real sales workflows. This allows us to compare each platform consistently while understanding where it performs best.

We score every eSign software using this weighted framework based on hands-on testing and real use cases.

Our scoring breakdown for CRM tools:

Features & functionality — 60%
User interface — 10%
Security — 10%
Pricing — 10%
Real-world experience — 10%

Most of the Salesforce alternatives featured in this guide also have dedicated review articles with full scores and detailed testing breakdowns.

However, this ranking isn’t based on review scores alone. We also compared each CRM directly with Salesforce based on pricing, usability, customization, automation, and real-world business fit.

As a result, every recommendation is designed for a different type of business and reason for switching.

Want a detailed breakdown of how we test each category?

Learn exactly how we test tools → Review methodology

Detailed Reviews of the Best Salesforce Alternatives

Wondering how each Salesforce alternative performed during our testing?

Check out our detailed reviews for each option we selected.

Nutshell

4.2/5

Nutshell is an all-in-one CRM that combines contact management, pipeline tracking, communication, reporting, and sales automation tools in one platform. Nutshell is built for small businesses that want a structured sales CRM without the overhead of an enterprise platform.

Best Salesforce alternative for small businesses

Quick verdict

Best Salesforce alternative for:

Small businesses that want an easy-to-use CRM with sales, communication, and pipeline management in one place.

Not ideal if:

You manage highly complex enterprise sales processes that require extensive customization.

Biggest advantage over Salesforce:

A much simpler CRM that doesn’t require extensive setup or administration.

Main tradeoff:

It isn’t designed for the same level of enterprise customization as Salesforce.

Why choose Nutshell over Salesforce

While testing Nutshell, I was able to import contacts, create leads, and build my first pipeline with very little setup. The core workflow was easy to follow, so I could start managing deals almost immediately.

As I spent more time with the platform, I discovered more advanced customization and automation features. They do take a bit of time to learn, but the everyday sales workflow always remained simple and easy to navigate.

What I liked most is that customer information stays organized in one place. Contacts, emails, notes, meetings, and tasks are all linked to the same deal, making it easy to see the full history of every opportunity.

I also appreciated being able to customize pipelines and automate routine tasks as my sales process became more structured. For a small business, it strikes a good balance between flexibility and ease of use.

Salesforce is built for organizations with highly complex sales operations, dedicated CRM administrators, and extensive customization needs. Nutshell takes a different approach by focusing on the features most small businesses use every day, making it a much easier CRM to adopt and manage.

The Good and Not-So-Good After Testing Nutshell

Pro	Why it’s important
Easy to learn	I could start managing contacts, pipelines, and deals quickly without spending much time on setup.
Everything stays connected	Contacts, deals, emails, meetings, notes, and tasks all remain linked together, making customer history easy to review.
Flexible pipeline management	I could customize stages, automate repetitive tasks, and create different pipelines as my workflow evolved.
Built-in communication	Emails and customer conversations stay attached to each deal, making follow-ups much easier.
Built for small businesses	It focuses on the CRM features most small businesses use every day without the overhead of an enterprise platform.

Con	The tradeoff
Advanced features take time to master	The core CRM is easy to use, but some automation and customization tools require more time to explore.
Not built for enterprise-scale customization	Organizations with highly specialized workflows may eventually need a more configurable platform like Salesforce.
Fewer enterprise capabilities	Large organizations that rely on advanced permissions, custom objects, or complex enterprise workflows may find Salesforce a better fit.

Plans & costs

No free plan, only a 14-day free trial
Foundation plan: $13/user/month
Growth plan: $25/user/month
Pro plan: $42/user/month
Business plan: $59/user/month
Enterprise plan: $79/user/month
Optional paid add-ons are available for additional functionality

Read my full review: Nutshell Review 2026 | Everything You Need to Know

Try Nutshell

HubSpot

4.5/5

HubSpot is an all-in-one CRM that combines sales, marketing, customer service, and automation in a single platform. Compared to Salesforce, it offers a more approachable experience while still giving growing businesses plenty of room to scale.

Full HubSpot review Visit HubSpot

Best Salesforce alternative for growing businesses

Quick verdict

Best Salesforce alternative for:

Growing businesses that want CRM, sales, marketing, and customer service tools in one platform.

Not ideal if:

You’re looking for a lightweight CRM or want to keep software costs low as your team grows.

Biggest advantage: over Salesforce:

A much easier learning curve with a powerful all-in-one ecosystem.

Main tradeoff:

Costs increase quickly as you unlock more advanced features and additional Hubs.

Why choose HubSpot over Salesforce

One thing I noticed almost immediately while testing HubSpot is how easy it is to get started. Importing contacts, creating deals, customizing pipelines, and navigating the platform all felt intuitive, even though HubSpot includes a wide range of features.

What makes it different from Salesforce is that it combines CRM, sales, marketing, customer service, and automation in one connected ecosystem that’s designed to be accessible from day one.

As my testing progressed, I found plenty of advanced features to grow into, but the platform never felt as overwhelming as a traditional enterprise CRM.

Another advantage is the free CRM. Before paying for an upgrade, I could already manage contacts, track deals, capture leads, and run basic email marketing campaigns. That makes HubSpot much easier to adopt for businesses that are still growing.

Salesforce still offers deeper customization for large enterprises with highly specialized sales processes. But if your business is growing and you want an all-in-one platform that’s easier to implement and manage, HubSpot strikes a better balance between functionality and usability.

The Good and Not-So-Good After Testing HubSpot

Pro	Why it’s important
Easy to get started	I was able to import contacts, customize pipelines, and begin managing deals without a complicated setup.
Complete business platform	CRM, sales, marketing, customer service, and automation all work together using the same customer data.
Generous free plan	The free CRM includes enough features to manage contacts, deals, lead capture, and basic email marketing before upgrading.
Powerful automation and integrations	As my needs grew, I could connect HubSpot with hundreds of business tools and automate increasingly complex workflows.
Scales with your business	The platform supports everything from small teams to growing organizations without requiring a move to another CRM.

Con	The tradeoff
Pricing increases quickly	Unlocking advanced automation, reporting, and marketing capabilities can become expensive.
More complex over time	As you start using multiple Hubs and advanced workflows, there’s more to learn and manage.
Less customizable than Salesforce	Businesses with highly specialized enterprise workflows may find Salesforce offers greater flexibility

Plans & costs

Free plan available
Starter plan: $10/seat/month
Professional plan: $1450/6 seats/month
Enterprise plan: $4700/8 seats/month

HubSpot also offers separate Marketing, Service, Content, and Operations Hubs, each with its own pricing. Costs can increase significantly as you add advanced features, extra seats, or additional Hubs.

Read my full review: HubSpot Review 2026 | I Tested It — Here’s the Truth

Try HubSpot

Pipedrive

4.1/5

Pipedrive is a sales-focused CRM built around visual pipeline management, deal tracking, and follow-ups. Compared to Salesforce, it strips away much of the complexity and focuses on helping sales teams move deals through the pipeline as efficiently as possible.

Full Pipedrive review Visit Pipedrive

Best Salesforce alternative for sales pipeline management

Quick verdict

Best Salesforce alternative for:

Sales teams that want a simple CRM focused on managing deals, follow-ups, and pipeline visibility.

Not ideal if:

You need enterprise-level customization or an all-in-one platform with marketing and customer service tools.

Biggest advantage over Salesforce:

A much simpler sales workflow centered around visual pipeline management.

Main tradeoff:

Many features beyond core sales management require paid add-ons.

Why choose Pipedrive over Salesforce

While testing Pipedrive, I noticed that almost every part of the platform revolves around the sales pipeline. Whether I was adding deals, scheduling activities, or reviewing follow-ups, everything stayed connected to the pipeline, so keeping track of my work felt straightforward.

One feature I especially liked was the separate Leads Inbox. New leads don’t immediately appear in the pipeline, which keeps active opportunities separate from contacts that still need qualification. As the number of deals grew, that made the pipeline much easier to manage.

I also appreciated how closely activities are tied to every deal. Calls, meetings, emails, notes, and follow-ups all stay connected to the same opportunity, making it easy to understand what has happened and what still needs attention.

Salesforce offers far more customization and enterprise functionality, but not every sales team needs that level of complexity. If your priority is simply keeping deals organized, staying on top of follow-ups, and maintaining a clear sales pipeline, Pipedrive delivers a much more focused experience with far less administration.

The Good and Not-So-Good After Testing Pipedrive

Pro	Why it’s important
Visual sales pipelines	I could see where every deal stood at a glance and move opportunities through each stage with drag-and-drop.
Activity-focused workflow	Calls, meetings, emails, and follow-ups stay attached to every deal, making daily sales work much easier to organize.
Separate Leads Inbox	Keeping unqualified leads outside the pipeline helped me stay focused on active opportunities.
Easy to learn	I was able to start managing contacts and deals almost immediately without a lengthy setup or training process.
Useful reporting	Dashboards made it easy to monitor pipeline performance, sales activities, and revenue trends.

Con	The tradeoff
No free plan	Businesses looking for a free CRM may prefer HubSpot or another alternative.
Paid add-ons	Lead generation, email marketing, document management, and other advanced capabilities require additional subscriptions.
Limited enterprise customization	Organizations with highly specialized workflows or complex permissions may find Salesforce a better long-term fit.

Plans & costs

No free plan, only a 14-day free trial
Lite plan: $14/user/month
Growth plan: $39/user/month
Premium plan: $59/user/month
Ultimate plan: $79/user/month
Optional add-ons available

Read my full review: Pipedrive Review 2026: Tested Firsthand — Here’s the Truth

Try Pipedrive

Copper CRM

4.4/5

Copper CRM is built specifically for Google Workspace, helping businesses manage contacts, deals, and customer communication without leaving Google’s ecosystem. Compared to Salesforce, it offers a much simpler experience that’s easier for Google Workspace teams to adopt.

Full Copper CRM review Visit Copper CRM

Best Salesforce alternative for Google Workspace users

Quick verdict

Best Salesforce alternative for:

Businesses already using Google Workspace that want a CRM built around Gmail, Google Calendar, Google Drive, and Google Contacts.

Not ideal if:

You need enterprise-level customization or advanced reporting without upgrading to the Business plan.

Biggest advantage over Salesforce:

A CRM that fits naturally into Google Workspace instead of requiring a separate enterprise platform.

Main tradeoff:

Advanced reporting and customization are more limited than Salesforce and several key features require the Business plan.

Why choose Copper over Salesforce

Getting started with Copper didn’t take long. I imported my contacts, built a pipeline, and started exploring the platform without much setup. Unlike Salesforce, which often requires significant configuration before teams can work efficiently, Copper felt ready to use almost immediately.

As I spent more time testing it, I appreciated how consistent the experience remained across the CRM. Whether I was managing contacts, opportunities, or automations, the layout stayed familiar, so I always knew where to find emails, notes, tasks, and activities.

The biggest advantage, though, is how deeply Copper works with Google Workspace. Gmail, Google Calendar, Google Drive, and Google Contacts aren’t treated as external integrations—they’re part of the way the CRM works. That makes the entire experience feel much more natural if your business already runs on Google’s ecosystem.

Salesforce offers significantly deeper customization, reporting, and enterprise capabilities. But if your team already lives inside Google Workspace and wants a CRM that’s easy to adopt without a lengthy implementation, Copper is a much better fit.

The Good and Not-So-Good After Testing Copper

Pro	Why it’s important
Built for Google Workspace	Gmail, Calendar, Drive, and Contacts work naturally with the CRM, so I didn’t have to constantly switch between different apps.
Easy to adopt	Importing contacts, creating pipelines, and getting started required very little setup or training.
Consistent interface	Every section follows the same layout, making it easy to move between contacts, deals, and activities.
Flexible pipeline templates	I could start with ready-made templates or build custom pipelines for different business workflows.
Well-organized customer records	Emails, files, activities, notes, and opportunities stay connected, making customer history easy to review.

Con	The tradeoff
No free plan	Businesses comparing free CRM options will need to look elsewhere.
Advanced reporting requires the Business plan	Custom Reports and several analytics features aren’t available on lower-priced plans.
Less enterprise flexibility	Organizations with highly customized sales processes may eventually need Salesforce’s deeper customization capabilities.

Plans & costs

No free plan, only a 14-day free trial
Basic plan: $23/user/month
Professional plan: $59/user/month
Business plan: $99/user/month

Read my full review: The 4 Biggest Takeaways From My Copper CRM Review

Zoho CRM

4.6/5

Zoho CRM is a highly customizable CRM that combines contact management, sales automation, AI-powered insights, and reporting in one platform. Compared to Salesforce, Zoho CRM is a more affordable solution that still delivers many of the same core CRM capabilities.

Visit Zoho CRM

Best Salesforce alternative for affordable customization

Quick verdict

Best Salesforce alternative for:

Businesses that want advanced customization, automation, and AI features without paying Salesforce prices.

Not ideal if:

You want a CRM that’s easy to learn with minimal setup and configuration.

Biggest advantage over Salesforce:

Many advanced CRM capabilities at a much lower cost.

Main tradeoff:

The platform takes time to fully customize and master.

Why choose Zoho CRM over Salesforce

What stood out most while testing Zoho CRM key features was how much functionality it offers for the price. I had access to advanced automation, AI-powered features, reporting, and customization without paying enterprise-level subscription fees.

I also liked how much control I had over the CRM itself. I could customize modules, pipelines, layouts, fields, and workflows to match different sales processes instead of adjusting my workflow to fit the software.

Salesforce still goes further when it comes to enterprise customization and supporting highly complex organizations. But during my testing, Zoho CRM delivered far more flexibility than most growing businesses are ever likely to need, while remaining much easier to justify from a pricing perspective.

If you need a powerful CRM with advanced automation and customization but don’t want the cost or complexity that often comes with Salesforce, Zoho CRM is one of the strongest alternatives I’ve tested.

The Good and Not-So-Good After Testing Zoho CRM

Pro	Why it’s important
Excellent value for money	I got AI, automation, customization, and reporting without paying enterprise-level prices.
Highly customizable	Modules, fields, layouts, pipelines, and dashboards can all be adapted to different sales processes.
Powerful automation	Workflows handled repetitive tasks like lead assignments, follow-ups, and notifications automatically.
AI-powered assistance	Zia helped with lead scoring, predictions, summaries, and recommended next steps.
Broad Zoho ecosystem	Connecting CRM with Zoho’s marketing, support, and business apps creates a complete business platform.

Con	The tradeoff
Steeper learning curve	Getting the most out of the platform’s customization and automation takes time.
Feature-rich interface	Teams looking for a lightweight CRM may find the number of options overwhelming.
Less enterprise depth than Salesforce	Large organizations with highly specialized workflows may still benefit from Salesforce’s broader enterprise capabilities.

Plans & costs

Free plan and 15-day free trial available
Standard: €14/user/month (billed annually)
Professional: €23/user/month (billed annually)
Enterprise: €40/user/month (billed annually)
Ultimate: €52/user/month (billed annually)

Try Zoho CRM

Monday CRM

4.6/5

Monday CRM is a flexible, board-based CRM that helps teams manage leads, sales pipelines, customer relationships, and internal collaboration from one platform. Compared to Salesforce, Monday CRM offers a more visual and adaptable way to organize work without the complexity of a traditional enterprise CRM.

Visit Monday CRM

Best Salesforce alternative for collaborative sales workflows

Quick verdict

Best Salesforce alternative for:

Teams that want to manage sales, projects, and collaboration from one highly customizable workspace.

Not ideal if:

You need deep enterprise CRM customization or prefer a traditional CRM with predefined sales modules.

Biggest advantage over Salesforce:

Much more flexible collaboration across sales and other teams with far less complexity.

Main tradeoff:

Some CRM-specific features require additional setup, and advanced capabilities are reserved for higher-tier plans.

Why choose Monday CRM over Salesforce

The first thing I noticed while testing Monday CRM is that it doesn’t feel like a traditional CRM. Rather than working within a fixed structure, I could customize boards, pipelines, fields, automations, and dashboards to fit the way my team actually works.

I also liked how easy it was to switch between different views of the same data. Whether I needed a Table, Kanban, Calendar, or Timeline view, I could change the layout in a few clicks while keeping all customer information in one place.

What really stood out, though, is how naturally Monday CRM supports collaboration beyond the sales team. Sales, onboarding, project delivery, and customer success can all work from the same workspace, making handoffs much easier than in a traditional CRM.

Salesforce offers far deeper customization and enterprise capabilities, but many businesses don’t need that level of complexity. If your priority is giving multiple teams a flexible workspace that adapts to your processes, Monday CRM is one of the strongest alternatives I’ve tested.

The Good and Not-So-Good After Testing Monday CRM

Pro	Why it’s important
Highly customizable workflows	I could tailor boards, pipelines, automations, and custom fields to match different business processes without writing code.
Visual interface	The board-based layout made it easy to track deals, manage tasks, and switch between multiple views depending on the work I was doing.
Useful automations	Automating task assignments, follow-ups, notifications, and status updates reduced repetitive manual work.
Flexible dashboards	Custom dashboards gave me a clear overview of pipeline performance, team activity, and sales metrics in one place.
Strong cross-team collaboration	Sales, onboarding, project delivery, and customer success can all work from the same workspace, making collaboration much smoother.

Con	The tradeoff
Learning curve for customization	Building boards, workflows, and automations takes some planning before everything works the way you want.
Advanced features require higher-tier plans	AI capabilities and several advanced automations are only available on more expensive plans.
Less enterprise depth than Salesforce	Organizations with highly specialized CRM requirements may still benefit from Salesforce’s broader customization and administration capabilities.

Plans & costs

No free plan, only a 14-day free trial
Basic: €12/seat/month (billed annually)
Standard: €17/seat/month (billed annually)
Pro: €28/seat/month (billed annually)
Enterprise: Custom pricing

Try Monday CRM

Final thoughts

A good CRM platform should make daily work easier. The best CRM software helps you automate sales processes, improve and track sales performance, and support long-term business growth.

That’s why the best Salesforce alternatives are the ones that fit your sales teams, sales process, and customer relationship management needs, rather than simply offering the longest list of features.

Before choosing an alternative to Salesforce, compare the key features that matter most, including workflow automation, contact management, lead management, custom reporting, and integration capabilities.

The right CRM should support the way your team works today and continue to grow with your business.

Explore our Apps directory

A curated directory of software tools we’ve independently reviewed, with links to full reviews, comparisons, and category guides.

Explore Apps directory

Why you can trust our reviews

Our mission? No fluff, no shortcuts—just honest, hands-on insights from productivity pros.

Discover how we stay transparent, read our review methodology, and let us know about any tools we missed.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the best Salesforce alternative?

The best Salesforce alternatives depend on your business needs. Nutshell is ideal for small businesses, Zoho CRM offers affordable customization, HubSpot is a great all-in-one CRM platform for growing companies, Pipedrive excels at sales pipeline management, Copper CRM is built for Google Workspace, and Monday CRM combines customer relationship management with project management and collaboration

Which Salesforce alternative is best for small businesses?

If you’re looking for an alternative to Salesforce for small teams, Nutshell is my top recommendation because it’s easy to learn and focuses on the CRM features most businesses actually use. Zoho CRM is another excellent option if you need more advanced workflow automation, AI-powered features, and room to scale without Salesforce’s pricing.

Is Zoho CRM a good replacement for Salesforce?

Yes. Zoho CRM is one of the strongest Salesforce competitors if you want advanced CRM software at a lower cost. Zoho CRM offers workflow automation, AI-powered assistance, custom objects, and strong contact management, while avoiding Salesforce’s enterprise pricing. It also includes a free plan for up to three users.

Why do businesses switch from Salesforce?

Many businesses replace Salesforce CRM because of its high pricing, steep learning curve, and the time required to configure and maintain the platform. Companies looking for a more user friendly CRM often choose CRM tools like Nutshell, Pipedrive, or Monday CRM, while businesses that still want advanced customization frequently move to Zoho CRM.

What should I compare before switching from Salesforce?

Before choosing one of the best Salesforce alternatives, focus on the key features your business actually needs. Compare CRM software based on customer relationship management, integration capabilities, sales force automation platforms, customer data, AI-powered automation, custom reporting, mobile apps, and pricing. The best choice is the CRM platform that fits your sales process and long-term business goals.

Disclosure: I only recommend products I would use myself, and all opinions expressed here are my own. This post may contain affiliate links through which, at no additional cost to you, I may earn a small commission. Read the full privacy policy here.

Full Nutshell review Visit Nutshell

The post Salesforce Alternatives: 6 Better CRM Options for 2026 appeared first on .

6 Best HubSpot Alternatives For 2026 | No Marketing Hype, Just Real Testing

Aron Kantor — Fri, 07 Aug 2026 16:24:31 +0000

HubSpot CRM offers an impressive combination of sales, marketing, and customer management tools, but that doesn’t mean it’s the best fit for every business. Depending on your budget, sales processes, and business needs, another CRM software may be a better choice.

After testing 10+ CRM tools, I found these to be the best HubSpot alternatives:

Nutshell → Best HubSpot alternative for growing sales teams
Pipedrive → Best HubSpot alternative for sales pipeline management
Copper CRM → Best HubSpot alternative for Google Workspace users
Salesforce Sales Cloud → Best HubSpot alternative for enterprises
Zoho CRM → Best HubSpot alternative for affordable customization
Monday CRM → Best HubSpot alternative for collaborative sales workflows

Best HubSpot Alternatives Compared

Need to decide quickly? Spend 30 seconds with the comparison table below.

CRM	Best if you want…	Why switch from HubSpot?	Learning curve	Pricing
Nutshell	An easier-to-manage sales CRM	Easier to use and more affordable	Easy	From $13/user/month
Pipedrive	Better visibility into every deal	More sales-focused deal tracking	Easy	From $14/user/month
Copper	A CRM that works inside Gmail	Native Google integration	Easy	From $23/user/month
Salesforce	Maximum control over complex sales operations	Enterprise-level customization and scalability	Advanced	From $25/user/month
Zoho CRM	Enterprise-style features on a smaller budget	More customization and automation for the price	Moderate	Free + from €14/user/month
Monday CRM	Sales and teamwork in one workspace	Flexible cross-team workflows	Moderate	From €12/seat/month

How We Chose the Best HubSpot Alternatives

We score every eSign software using this weighted framework based on hands-on testing and real use cases.

Our scoring breakdown for CRM tools:

Features & functionality — 60%
User interface — 10%
Security — 10%
Pricing — 10%
Real-world experience — 10%

Most of the HubSpot alternatives featured in this guide also have dedicated review articles with full scores and detailed testing breakdowns.

However, this ranking isn’t based on review scores alone. We also compared each CRM directly with HubSpot based on pricing, usability, customization, automation, and real-world business fit.

As a result, every recommendation is designed for a different type of business and reason for switching.

Want a detailed breakdown of how we test each category?

Learn exactly how we test tools → Review methodology

Detailed Reviews of the Best HubSpot Alternatives

Wondering how each HubSpot alternative performed during our testing?

Check out our detailed reviews for each option we selected.

Nutshell

4.2/5

Nutshell is an all-in-one CRM built for small businesses that want to manage contacts, pipelines, communication, and reporting from a single platform. It offers a simpler, more sales-focused experience than HubSpot.

Best HubSpot alternative for growing sales teams

Quick verdict

Best HubSpot alternative for:

Small businesses and growing sales teams that want a simpler, more affordable CRM without sacrificing the core sales features they rely on.

Not ideal if:

You’re looking for a very simple or lightweight CRM

Biggest advantage over HubSpot:

A focused sales CRM that’s simpler to use and more affordable.

Main tradeoff:

It doesn’t offer the same breadth of marketing and business tools as HubSpot.

Why choose Nutshell over HubSpot

HubSpot offers an enormous range of tools, but many businesses end up paying for features they rarely use. While testing Nutshell, I found it much easier to focus on day-to-day sales work without navigating through multiple Hubs and advanced marketing features.

It still gives you everything most sales teams need—contact management, customizable pipelines, automation, reporting, email communication, and AI assistance—but presents those features in a way that’s easier to navigate without the broader marketing ecosystem.

That’s why Nutshell is my top HubSpot alternative. If your priority is managing sales rather than running an entire marketing ecosystem, it delivers much of the same core CRM functionality with far less complexity.

The Good and Not-So-Good After Testing Nutshell

Pro	Why it’s important
Easy to get started	I was able to import contacts, build a pipeline, and start managing deals without much setup.
Strong pipeline management	Multiple pipelines, custom stages, and automation make it easy to organize different sales processes as your team grows.
Built-in communication tools	Emails, meetings, notes, and customer conversations stay attached to every deal, making follow-ups much easier.
Useful AI features	AI summarizes calls, suggests next steps, and helps create emails, reducing repetitive admin work.
More affordable than HubSpot	Core CRM functionality is available without paying for a large marketing and customer service ecosystem.

Con	The tradeoff
No advanced marketing suite	If you rely heavily on email marketing automation, landing pages, or CMS tools, HubSpot offers a broader ecosystem.
Advanced features require some exploration	Most day-to-day tasks are easy to pick up, but some automation and customization options take more time to fully understand.

Plans & costs

No free plan, only a 14-day free trial
Foundation plan: $13/user/month
Growth plan: $25/user/month
Pro plan: $42/user/month
Business plan: $59/user/month
Enterprise plan: $79/user/month
Optional paid add-ons are available for additional functionality

Read my full review: Nutshell Review 2026 | Everything You Need to Know

Try Nutshell

Pipedrive

4.1/5

Pipedrive is a sales-focused CRM built around visual pipeline management, deal tracking, and follow-ups. Instead of combining CRM with a broader suite of marketing and customer service tools like HubSpot, it focuses on helping sales teams organize opportunities and move deals through the pipeline.

Full Pipedrive review Visit Pipedrive

Best HubSpot alternative for sales pipeline management

Quick verdict

Best HubSpot alternative for:

Sales teams that want a CRM centered around pipeline management, deal tracking, and follow-ups.

Not ideal if:

You need built-in marketing, customer service, or content management tools.

Biggest advantage over HubSpot:

A cleaner, more focused sales experience that keeps pipelines and activities front and center.

Main tradeoff:

Many features beyond core sales management require paid add-ons.

Why choose Pipedrive over HubSpot

One feature I especially liked was the separate Leads Inbox. New leads don’t immediately appear in your pipeline, which keeps active deals separate from contacts that haven’t been qualified yet. As I added more opportunities, that small detail made the pipeline easier to manage.

I also appreciated how much emphasis Pipedrive puts on activities. Calls, meetings, emails, notes, and follow-ups are always tied to the relevant deal, so it’s easy to see what has already happened and what still needs to be done.

HubSpot offers a much broader platform with marketing, customer service, and content management tools. But if your team’s priority is managing deals, staying on top of follow-ups, and moving opportunities through the pipeline, Pipedrive delivers a more focused experience with less complexity.

The Good and Not-So-Good After Testing Pipedrive

Pro	Why it’s important
Visual sales pipelines	I could see where every deal stood at a glance and move opportunities through each stage with drag-and-drop.
Activity-focused workflow	Calls, meetings, emails, and follow-ups stay attached to every deal, making it easier to stay organized.
Separate Leads Inbox	Keeping unqualified leads out of the pipeline made it much easier to focus on active opportunities.
Easy to learn	I was able to start managing contacts and deals almost immediately without spending much time learning the platform.
Useful reporting	Dashboards made it easy to monitor pipeline performance, sales activities, and revenue trends.

Con	The tradeoff
No free plan	Businesses looking for a free CRM may find HubSpot a better fit.
Paid add-ons	Lead generation, email marketing, and some advanced functionality require additional subscriptions.

Plans & costs

No free plan, only a 14-day free trial
Lite plan: $14/user/month
Growth plan: $39/user/month
Premium plan: $59/user/month
Ultimate plan: $79/user/month
Optional add-ons available

Read my full review: Pipedrive Review 2026: Tested Firsthand — Here’s the Truth

Try Pipedrive

Copper CRM

4.4/5

Copper is a CRM built specifically for Google Workspace, helping businesses manage contacts, deals, and customer communication without leaving Google’s ecosystem. Compared to HubSpot, it offers a more natural experience for teams that already spend most of their day in Gmail and other Google apps.

Full Copper CRM review Visit Copper CRM

Best HubSpot alternative for Google Workspace users

Quick verdict

Best HubSpot alternative for:

Businesses already using Google Workspace that want a CRM built around Gmail, Google Calendar, Google Drive, and Google Contacts.

Not ideal if:

You need advanced reporting or enterprise-level customization on a lower-priced plan.

Biggest advantage over HubSpot:

Native Google Workspace integration that feels like part of the tools your team already uses.

Main tradeoff:

Many advanced reporting features are only available on the Business plan.

Why choose Copper over HubSpot

Getting started with Copper didn’t take long. I imported my test contacts, created a pipeline, and started exploring the platform without needing much setup.

As I spent more time testing it, I appreciated how consistent the experience remained across the CRM. Whether I was managing contacts, working with opportunities, or creating automations, the layout stayed familiar, so I always knew where to find activities, notes, emails, and tasks.

The biggest difference, is how closely Copper works with Google Workspace. Gmail, Google Calendar, Google Drive, and Google Contacts aren’t treated like optional integrations. They’re part of the way the CRM works, which makes the experience more natural for businesses already using Google’s ecosystem.

HubSpot also connects with Google Workspace, but it offers a much broader platform built around sales, marketing, and customer service. If your team already relies on Google’s apps and wants a CRM that fits into that workflow rather than expanding it, Copper is the stronger choice.

The Good and Not-So-Good After Testing Copper

Pro	Why it’s important
Built for Google Workspace	Gmail, Calendar, Drive, and Contacts work naturally with the CRM, so I didn’t have to constantly move between different apps.
Consistent interface	Every section follows the same layout, making it easy to navigate between contacts, deals, and activities.
Flexible pipeline templates	I could quickly start with ready-made templates or create custom pipelines for different workflows.
Well-organized customer records	Emails, files, activities, notes, and opportunities stay connected to every contact, making customer history easy to review.
Easy to get started	Importing contacts, building a pipeline, and exploring the platform required very little setup.

Con	The tradeoff
No free plan	Businesses looking for a free CRM may find HubSpot a better starting point.
Advanced reporting costs more	Custom Reports and several advanced capabilities require the Business plan.

Plans & costs

No free plan, only a 14-day free trial
Basic plan: $23/user/month
Professional plan: $59/user/month
Business plan: $99/user/month

Read my full review: The 4 Biggest Takeaways From My Copper CRM Review

Salesforce Sales Cloud

4.4/5

Salesforce Sales Cloud is an enterprise CRM designed for organizations with complex sales processes, large sales teams, and high lead volumes. It offers far more customization than HubSpot, making it a better fit for businesses that have outgrown a simpler CRM.

Visit Salesforce

Best HubSpot alternative for enterprises

Quick verdict

Best HubSpot alternative for:

Large businesses and enterprises managing complex sales processes across multiple teams.

Not ideal if:

You want a CRM that’s quick to learn and easy to set up.

Biggest advantage over HubSpot:

A much higher level of customization for complex sales operations.

Main tradeoff:

A steeper learning curve and significantly more time required for setup.

Why choose Salesforce over HubSpot

The first thing I noticed while exploring Salesforce was just how much the platform can handle. Nearly every part of the sales process can be customized, from lead and contact management to pipelines, automation, and reporting.

That flexibility comes with a tradeoff, though. Salesforce isn’t the kind of CRM you can learn in an afternoon. There are plenty of settings, workflows, and customization options, so getting everything configured takes time. During testing, it was clear that the platform is designed for businesses with more complex sales operations rather than teams looking for a quick setup.

HubSpot offers a more approachable experience, but Salesforce gives larger organizations much more control over how their CRM works. If your business manages high lead volumes, multiple sales teams, or longer sales cycles, that additional flexibility becomes much more valuable.

The Good and Not-So-Good After Testing Salesforce

Pro	Why it’s important
Highly customizable platform	I could tailor objects, fields, pipelines, automations, and reports to support even very complex sales processes.
Powerful automation	Workflow automation, lead scoring, and approvals helped reduce repetitive work across larger sales teams.
Detailed reporting	Dashboards and reports provided deep insights into pipeline performance, sales forecasting, and team activity.
Built to scale	Salesforce handled complex sales operations and multiple teams far better than most CRM platforms I tested.
Extensive integrations	The AppExchange ecosystem makes it easy to connect Salesforce with hundreds of business applications.

Con	The tradeoff
Steep learning curve	New users and smaller businesses should expect to spend time learning the platform.
Time-consuming setup	Getting the CRM configured for your business often requires significant planning and customization.
Higher overall cost	As your team grows and you add advanced functionality, subscription costs can increase quickly.

Plans & costs

Free plan available
Starter Suite: $25/user/month
Pro Suite: $100/user/month

Try Salesforce

Zoho CRM

4.6/5

Zoho CRM is a highly customizable CRM that combines contact management, sales automation, AI-powered insights, and reporting in one platform. Compared to HubSpot, it offers more flexibility for businesses that want to tailor their CRM without paying enterprise-level prices.

Visit Zoho CRM

Best HubSpot alternative for affordable customization

Quick verdict

Best HubSpot alternative for:

Businesses that want a highly customizable CRM with advanced automation at a lower cost than HubSpot.

Not ideal if:

You want a CRM that’s easy to learn with minimal setup and configuration.

Biggest advantage over HubSpot:

More customization and automation at a significantly lower price.

Main tradeoff:

The interface and advanced setup require more time to learn.

Why choose Zoho CRM over HubSpot

What stood out most while testing Zoho CRM was how much functionality it offers for the price. I had access to advanced automation, AI-powered features, reporting, and customization at a price point that compares favorably with HubSpot’s higher-tier plans.

I also liked how much control I had over the CRM itself. I could customize modules, pipelines, layouts, fields, and workflows to match different sales processes rather than adapting my workflow to the software.

That level of flexibility makes a real difference once your business starts growing or your sales process becomes more structured.

HubSpot is easier to pick up, but many of its more advanced capabilities come with higher-tier plans. Zoho CRM gives you much more room to customize how your CRM works before you reach that price point, which is why I think it offers better long-term value for businesses with more specific sales workflows.

I’d still choose HubSpot if marketing is at the center of your business. But if your CRM is primarily there to support your sales team, Zoho CRM gives you far more control over how everything is organized and automated, while keeping costs much more manageable.

The Good and Not-So-Good After Testing Zoho CRM

Pro	Why it’s important
Excellent value for money	I got AI, automation, customization, and reporting without paying enterprise-level prices.
Highly customizable	Modules, fields, layouts, pipelines, and dashboards can all be adapted to different sales processes.
Powerful automation	Workflows handled repetitive tasks like lead assignments, follow-ups, and notifications automatically.
AI-powered assistance	Zia helped with lead scoring, predictions, summaries, and recommended next steps.
Broad Zoho ecosystem	Connecting CRM with Zoho’s marketing, support, and business apps creates a much more complete business platform.

Con	The tradeoff
Steeper learning curve	Getting the most out of the platform’s customization and automation takes time.
Feature-rich interface	Teams looking for a lightweight CRM may find the number of options overwhelming.
Advanced setup requires planning	Building more complex workflows and automations requires some initial configuration.

Plans & costs

Free plan and 15-day free trial available
Standard: €14/user/month (billed annually)
Professional: €23/user/month (billed annually)
Enterprise: €40/user/month (billed annually)
Ultimate: €52/user/month (billed annually)

Try Zoho CRM

Monday CRM

4.6/5

Monday CRM is a flexible, board-based CRM that helps teams manage leads, pipelines, customer relationships, and internal collaboration from one platform. Compared to HubSpot, it offers more freedom to customize workflows and organize work across different teams.

Visit Monday CRM

Best HubSpot alternative for collaborative sales workflows

Quick verdict

Best HubSpot alternative for:

Teams that want to manage sales, projects, and collaboration from one highly customizable workspace.

Not ideal if:

You prefer a traditional CRM with more built-in sales features and less configuration.

Biggest advantage over HubSpot:

Greater flexibility to build sales workflows that match the way your team already works.

Main tradeoff:

Some CRM features require additional setup, and advanced capabilities are reserved for higher-tier plans.

Why choose Monday CRM over HubSpot

My first observatioon during testing was that Monday CRM doesn’t feel limited to a traditional CRM. Rather than following a predefined structure, I could customize boards, pipelines, fields, automations, and dashboards to match the way my team works.

I also liked how easy it was to switch between different views of the same data. Whether I needed a Table, Kanban, Calendar, or Timeline view, I could change the layout in just a few clicks while keeping all my customer information in one place.

HubSpot offers a more complete platform for businesses that rely heavily on marketing, customer service, and content management. But if your team collaborates across sales, onboarding, project delivery, or customer success, Monday CRM gives you much more freedom to build workflows that fit your processes.

The Good and Not-So-Good After Testing Monday CRM

Pro	Why it’s important
Highly customizable workflows	I could tailor boards, pipelines, automations, and custom fields to match different sales processes without writing code.
Visual interface	The board-based layout made it easy to track deals, manage tasks, and switch between multiple views depending on the work I was doing.
Useful automations	Automating task assignments, follow-ups, notifications, and status updates reduced repetitive manual work.
Flexible dashboards	Custom dashboards gave me a clear overview of pipeline performance, team activity, and sales metrics in one place.
Strong cross-team collaboration	Sales, onboarding, and project-related work can all stay connected in the same workspace, making handoffs much easier.

Con	The tradeoff
Learning curve for customization	Building boards, workflows, and automations takes some planning before everything works the way you want.
Advanced features require higher-tier plans	AI capabilities and some advanced automations are only available on more expensive plans.
Less traditional CRM experience	Teams expecting a classic CRM interface may need some time to adjust to Monday’s board-based approach.

Plans & costs

No free plan, only a 14-day free trial
Basic: €12/seat/month (billed annually)
Standard: €17/seat/month (billed annually)
Pro: €28/seat/month (billed annually)
Enterprise: Custom pricing

Try Monday CRM

Final thoughts

Choosing the best HubSpot alternative comes down to understanding what your business needs from a CRM. HubSpot CRM combines sales, marketing, customer support, and a powerful marketing platform, but many businesses don’t need all the features or the higher cost that comes with its larger paid plans.

So before choosing the right HubSpot CRM alternative, think about your business needs today and where your team is headed next. Compare CRM features like lead management, workflow automation, email marketing, sales automation, customer support capabilities, and pricing.

The best CRM software isn’t the one with the most features, but the one your team will actually use to manage customer relationships, streamline sales processes, and support long-term growth.

Explore our Apps directory

A curated directory of software tools we’ve independently reviewed, with links to full reviews, comparisons, and category guides.

Explore Apps directory

Why you can trust our reviews

Our mission? No fluff, no shortcuts—just honest, hands-on insights from productivity pros.

Discover how we stay transparent, read our review methodology, and let us know about any tools we missed.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the best HubSpot alternative?

It depends. Nutshell is my top choice for growing sales teams, Pipedrive excels at sales pipelines, Zoho CRM offers affordable customization, Copper CRM is ideal for Google Workspace, Monday CRM supports collaborative sales workflows, and Salesforce Sales Cloud is best for enterprises.

Why do businesses look for HubSpot CRM alternatives?

Many businesses move away from HubSpot CRM because paid plans become expensive as they need more advanced CRM features. Others prefer CRM tools focused on sales management, lead management, workflow automation, or project management rather than HubSpot’s broader marketing platform.

Is Zoho CRM a good alternative to HubSpot?

Yes. Zoho CRM is one of the best HubSpot alternatives if you want advanced automation and customization at a lower cost. Zoho CRM pricing includes a free plan for up to three users, with paid plans starting at €14 per user/month (billed annually), making it an affordable CRM for growing businesses.

Which HubSpot alternative is best for small businesses?

For small businesses, Nutshell is a great choice if you want an easy-to-use sales-focused CRM with contact management and pipeline management. Zoho CRM is better if you need more advanced automation, customizable dashboards, and flexible sales processes.

How do I choose the right HubSpot CRM alternative?

The right HubSpot CRM alternative depends on your business needs. Compare CRM features like lead management, sales automation, workflow automation, email marketing, sales forecasting, customer support capabilities, and pricing to find the CRM platform that best supports your sales processes.

The post 6 Best HubSpot Alternatives For 2026 | No Marketing Hype, Just Real Testing appeared first on .

Fellow vs Plaud: The Biggest Differences Between a Virtual and a Physical Notetaker

Aron Kantor — Sat, 01 Aug 2026 17:11:13 +0000

Both Fellow and Plaud use AI to capture conversations and generate meeting notes, but they solve very different problems.

Fellow is built around secure AI meeting intelligence for organizations, while Plaud focuses on capturing conversations anywhere.
Both delivered highly accurate transcription during my testing, but their strengths go well beyond AI meeting notes.
Plaud requires dedicated hardware (starting at $159) plus a monthly subscription (starting at $8.33/month), while Fellow is entirely software-based, with pricing starting at $ 7/month
Unlike Fellow, Plaud doesn’t automatically notify others that a recording is taking place
Fellow gives admins, IT, and compliance teams granular control over recording policies, data retention, and access, with workspace-level ownership that stays with your organization even when employees leave. Plaud is tied to individual users.

Keep reading, and by the end of this Fellow vs Plaud comparison, you’ll know which tool is the better fit for your workflow.

Verdict

Here’s the quick verdict if you don’t want to read the full Fellow vs Plaud review:

Best for:
Fellow: Enterprise organizations and teams in regulated industries that need an advanced and safe AI note-taker
Plaud: Professionals, founders, and consultants who frequently record in-person meetings, phone calls, and ideas on the go.

Not ideal for:
Fellow: Free AI note-taking
Plaud: Organizations that need centralized governance, compliance controls, or company-wide ownership of meeting data.

Biggest strength:
Fellow: Highly accurate AI meeting notes with granular controls over recording, retention, and compliance.
Plaud: Effortless wearable recording with accurate AI summaries and transcription

Biggest weakness:
Fellow: The free version is more like a trial
Plaud: Built primarily for individual users rather than organization-wide collaboration and governance.

Verdict:
Fellow is the better choice for organizations that need AI meeting intelligence, collaboration, and enterprise governance. Plaud, on the other hand, is ideal for professionals who spend more time in in-person meetings, on phone calls, or capturing ideas throughout the day and don’t need organization-wide governance or centralized administration.

Winner:
Fellow for secure AI meeting intelligence and organization-wide collaboration. Plaud for capturing conversations and ideas beyond virtual meetings.

Tested with our review & scoring methodology Real-world testing Unbiased evaluation

My ratings: Fellow vs Plaud

Fellow

Review

Transcription & recording

AI meeting notes

Collaboration features

Other capabilities

Integrations

User interface

Paid plans

Free plan

Privacy and safety

My experience

4.5

pros

	Accurate transcriptions and summaries
	Bot and Bot-less transcription & recording
	It offers numerous productivity tools besides the essential features
	AI summaries
	A budget-friendly option for teams
	High-security standards

cons

	Have more features in the free plan
	You need to install the Fellow desktop app in order to use botless recording

Plaud

Aron Kantor

Transcription & recording

AI meeting notes

Collaboration features

Other capabilities

Integrations

User interface

Paid plans

Free plan

Privacy and safety

My experience

4.5

pros

	One-button recording
	Excellent transcription accuracy
	Well-structured AI summaries
	Ask Plaud feature
	Built-in voice editor
	Offline recording support
	Lightweight, comfortable design

cons

	No conversation intelligence or coaching features
	The initial setup was less intuitive than expected
	No quick way to assign AI-generated action items to teammates
	The dedicated hardware is only worth it if you record frequently

Key differences between Fellow and Plaud

Here is a short overview of the key differences I found in the Fellow vs Plaud showdown:

	Fellow	Plaud
Best for	Enterprise organizations and regulated teams (investment banking, private equity, legal) needing an AI meeting note taker with granular compliance control	Professionals who frequently record in-person meetings, phone calls, and ideas on the go
Core focus	AI meeting assistant built with bot and botless recording flexibility, team collaboration, granular data retention, and security controls	AI transcription, voice recording, and AI summaries
Key strengths	Collaborative meeting agendas Bot and bot-free recording Ask Fellow across meetings and channels Strong collaboration and enterprise features Password-protected meeting recaps Data retention options (video stored, or zero-day retention)	One-button recording with dedicated hardware Accurate AI transcription and summaries Ask Plaud AI Offline recording and wearable design
Main limitations	Free plan has limited usageUser needs desktop app to use botless recording	Requires dedicated hardware to get the full experience
Ease of use	Easy	Easy
Pricing	Free plan: Available Team plan: $7/user/month Business plan: $15/user/month Enterprise plan: $25/user/month	Free plan: Available Pro plan: $8.33/user/month Unlimited plan: $19.99/user/month Team plan: $20/user/month
Integrations	Zoom, Microsoft Teams, Google Meet, Slack, CRMs, project management tools, calendars, Claude, Glean, Global Relay	Google Calendar, Outlook, Zapier, Make
Cross-platform	Web / Desktop (Windows & macOS) / Mobile (Android & iOS)	iOS / Android + Plaud hardware

The Scoring System We Used

To keep our reviews and final scores fair and consistent, we evaluate every AI note-taking tool using a standardized testing framework built on real-world usage and hands-on experience.

We evaluate every AI note-taking tool using this weighted framework, based on hands-on testing in real meetings and everyday workflows.

Our scoring breakdown after testing 20+ AI note-takers:

Features & functionality — 50%
User interface — 10%
Pricing — 20%
Security — 10%
Real-world experience — 10%

Want a detailed breakdown of how we test each category?

Learn exactly how we test tools → Review methodology

Comparing my day-to-day experience with both tools

In the sections below, I’ll compare Fellow and Plaud based on my hands-on testing, covering their features, pricing, user interface, strengths, weaknesses, and the types of users each tool is best suited for.

My hands-on experience with Fellow

After relying on Fellow for more than a year and comparing it with over 20 AI note-taking tools, I still consider it the most well-rounded solution I’ve tested. It wasn’t just the quality of the transcription that impressed me, but how the platform supported the entire meeting workflow.

During my testing, Fellow consistently delivered transcription accuracy above 95% and produced structured AI summaries just a few minutes after each meeting. Instead of replaying recordings, I could quickly review the key decisions, discussion points, and follow-up tasks.

The platform also helped before the meeting even started. I could review AI-generated meeting briefs, revisit previous conversations, and organize agendas in advance, making it much easier to jump back into ongoing projects.

I also liked Fellow’s flexible recording options. Depending on the situation, I could choose between bot-based and bot-free recording, and both worked reliably across virtual and in-person meetings. Password-protected meeting recaps were another welcome addition, giving organizations more control over how shared meeting summaries are accessed.

Overall, Fellow stood out as the most complete AI meeting intelligence platform I tested, combining accurate meeting notes with collaboration, flexible recording, and enterprise-grade governance.

Read my full Fellow Review: My Thoughts After +12 Months (2026)

Short on time? Here’s a quick overview of Fellow

Who should use Fellow

Teams and organizations that need a secure, scalable AI note-taking solution
Regulated industries like investment banking, asset managers, alternative investment management, private equity, hedge funds.
Professionals with frequent meetings who want highly accurate transcriptions
Businesses that need centralized governance, compliance controls, and organization-wide ownership of meeting data.
Users who want more than just transcription (collaboration tools, Ask Fellow, meeting agenda)
Those who value bot and bot-less recording flexibility depending on privacy needs

Who should NOT use Fellow

Users looking for a strong free plan (it feels more like a limited trial)
Users that need a cheap AI note-taker

My hands-on experience with Plaud

Plaud genuinely surprised me and exceeded my expectations. Before testing it, I relied on the mobile apps of AI note-takers to capture ideas and meetings, and I didn’t think I needed a dedicated recording device.

After using the NotePin for a few weeks, my perspective changed. The combination of its lightweight design, one-button recording, accurate transcription, and well-structured AI summaries made it much easier to capture conversations and ideas without interrupting the moment.

If your day involves in-person meetings, phone calls, commuting, or capturing ideas on the go, Plaud offers a noticeably smoother experience than reaching for your phone every time.

That said, I also realized Plaud feels much more like a personal productivity tool than an organization-wide meeting platform. It works exceptionally well for individuals, but it doesn’t offer the centralized administration or governance features larger organizations typically expect.

Read my full What I Learned After Carrying Plaud Every Day (Plaud Review 2026)

Short on time? Here’s a quick overview of Plaud

When to choose Plaud

You frequently have in-person meetings, phone calls, or conversations you want to capture.
You regularly brainstorm while driving, commuting, or traveling.
You want a dedicated recording device instead of relying on your phone.
You need reliable AI transcription and well-structured summaries.
You want to replace both your voice memo app and AI note-taker with one solution.

When you should skip Plaud

You only attend virtual meetings.
You don’t need a dedicated recording device.
You want conversation intelligence features like talk-time analysis, filler-word detection, or coaching insights.
You need to assign AI-generated action items directly to teammates.
You don’t record ideas or conversations often enough to justify dedicated hardware.
Your company requires centralized IT administration, compliance controls, or organization-wide ownership of meeting data.

Key features

Below, I’ll walk you through the features that stood out the most during my Fellow vs Plaud testing.

Fellow’s features

Bot-free or bot transcription

One of Fellow’s biggest advantages is that you can choose whether to record meetings with a bot or without one. It supports Zoom, Microsoft Teams, Google Meet, and Slack Huddles, automatically recording and transcribing meetings in more than 92 languages.

If you prefer bot-free recording, simply select Record without bot, and Fellow captures the meeting in the background while maintaining the same enterprise-grade privacy and security controls as bot-based recordings.

If you choose to use a bot instead, it always requests permission to join the meeting and appears as a participant, so everyone knows the meeting is being recorded.

Based on my testing, Fellow’s transcriptions were highly accurate, around 95% or higher. They were available within a few minutes and included timestamps and speaker identification.

Security and recording controls

Fellow prioritizes enterprise-grade security with SOC 2, HIPAA, and GDPR compliance built in.

What stood out most was the zero-day retention option: Fellow gives you the option for raw recordings and transcripts to be deleted immediately after AI processing, so sensitive content never persists in the system.

For teams that need to share summaries, password-protected recaps let you lock down meeting notes while keeping the productivity benefits of automated action items and summaries.

The compliance portal gives admins granular control over recording rules and restrictions, so you can enforce policies across your workspace, whether that’s preventing recordings on certain call types or restricting who can access public recaps.

I also appreciated that Fellow makes clear that customer meeting data isn’t used to train AI models and remains fully under your ownership.

For organizations handling MNPI, privileged conversations, or patient data, these features move Fellow from “interesting tool” to “actually compliant solution.”

Recordings library and channels

Fellow automatically records calls, which you can access through your transcription and meeting notes. I found the recordings library valuable, especially for teams or larger organizations. You can organize your previous meetings into custom channels and auto-publish your recordings to the right ones.

Furthermore, you can create new channels for yourself or even your whole company. This library helps you structure your meeting recaps and offers an excellent way to organize your meeting history, and a way to share recaps with people who did not attend those meetings but want access to that information.

For example, the CEO can be a part of the Sales calls channel or the Project Check-In channel even if they didn’t attend those meetings, and then use “Ask Fellow” to ask for insights and updates from those conversations.

AI meeting notes

Fellow automatically generates AI meeting summaries that highlight key discussion points, decisions, and action items. Instead of reading an entire transcript, I could quickly review the summary and immediately understand what happened during the meeting.

I also liked that action items could be assigned directly to team members, making responsibilities clear before everyone left the meeting. Every summary remained connected to its transcript and recording, so finding additional context was always easy.

Meeting agendas

Meeting agendas are one of Fellow’s most distinctive features because they improve meetings before they even begin.

You can build collaborative agendas, ask AI to suggest discussion topics, and use AI-powered pre-meeting briefs that summarize previous meetings, outstanding action items, and participant information. I found these briefs especially valuable when I had back-to-back meetings and very little time to prepare.

Everyone attending the meeting can contribute agenda items, assign talking points or action items, and even create private notes that are only visible to them during the meeting. Fellow’s Agenda Builder can also generate an agenda automatically using the meeting title and calendar description.

Clips

Clips make it easy to capture and share the most important moments from a meeting without sending the entire recording.

After opening a recording, you can select the beginning and end of a clip, save it to your recordings library, or share it directly with teammates.

I also liked that Ask Fellow can generate clips for you. For example, you can ask it to create a clip of a specific customer comment, and it will find and generate that segment automatically.

Ask Fellow

Ask Fellow is much more than a chatbot. It searches the meetings and channels you have access to, even if you didn’t attend them, to answer questions using your organization’s meeting history.

During testing, I used it to ask questions like “What did we decide about this project?” or “What should I follow up on from yesterday’s meeting?” and it quickly surfaced the relevant discussions, decisions, and action items.

Beyond answering questions, Ask Fellow can prepare you for upcoming meetings, summarize priorities, generate follow-up emails, create and edit documents, export content to Google Docs, Notion, or Confluence, generate meeting clips, manage your calendar, and remember your preferences over time.

Team collaboration

What makes Fellow special is that it was designed for the whole organization’s use cases. Whether it’s sales calls, interviews, or one-on-ones, you can implement Fellow in every team. It offers an excellent way to handle both external and internal calls and provides incredibly helpful collaboration features.

It supports collaborative agenda creation, you can assign action items, and easily share the meeting notes with others. Even when you’re using botless recording functionality, internal attendees in your organization will know that they are being recorded.

Similarly, Fellow will always prompt you to invite attendees to the meeting agenda and AI notes if you are recording an impromptu huddle or meeting, always keeping collaboration and alignment in mind.

Unlike Plaud, which is primarily designed around an individual’s device and account, Fellow gives organizations centralized ownership of meeting content. When employees leave the company, recordings, transcripts, and meeting notes remain within the organization’s workspace instead of staying tied to a personal account.

This organization-wide approach also simplifies offboarding because recordings, transcripts, and meeting notes remain within the organization’s workspace instead of staying tied to an individual’s account.

Integrations

Fellow integrates with the tools most teams already use, including Zoom, Microsoft Teams, Google Meet, Slack, calendars, project management platforms, and enterprise CRM systems like Salesforce and HubSpot.

Rather than replacing your existing workflow, Fellow integrates into it by connecting meeting notes, recordings, and follow-up tasks to the rest of your productivity stack.

For organizations in highly regulated industries, it also integrates with compliance archiving solutions like Global Relay, making it easier to manage conversations within existing governance and compliance workflows.

Use this link to sign up and get 10% off the paid plans if you upgrade.

Plaud’s features

One-button recording

One thing I quickly appreciated about Plaud was how effortless it was to start recording. Instead of unlocking my phone, opening an app, and starting a recording, I simply pressed the button on the NotePin and started talking.

Compared to most AI note-takers, this was much faster and more convenient, especially while driving or commuting. After a few days, recording with Plaud became second nature, and I found myself capturing ideas far more often simply because the process required almost no effort.

While Fellow works best for scheduled meetings, Plaud excels when conversations happen away from your desk. I found it much easier to capture spontaneous ideas, phone calls, and in-person discussions without opening an app or joining a meeting.

This individual-first approach is one of Plaud’s biggest strengths, but it also defines who it’s best suited for. Since the device and recordings are typically tied to an individual user’s account rather than centrally managed by an organization’s IT team, Plaud is a much better fit for personal productivity than organization-wide deployments.

Accurate AI transcription and summaries

Plaud prepares AI meeting notes with key discussion points, decisions, and next arrangements. Depending on the recording length, it usually took around 5–10 minutes to upload the recording, generate the transcript, and create the AI summary.

The structured notes gave me a quick overview of every conversation without reading the full transcript. I could also edit the summary, rewrite sections, or generate different versions using templates like meeting minutes, highlights, intent analysis, and concept insights.

Since Plaud supports many languages, I also tested it in Hungarian. I was genuinely impressed by how accurately it transcribed conversations and generated summaries despite Hungarian being a challenging language for most AI note-takers.

That said, unlike Fellow, Plaud focuses on summarizing individual conversations rather than helping teams collaborate around them with agendas, shared notes, and follow-up workflows.

Ask Plaud

This is the feature I used the most.

Instead of searching through transcripts manually, I just asked questions like What 3deadlines were mentioned?, What tasks do I need to complete this week?, or What decisions were made during the meeting?

The responses were generated in just a few seconds. What impressed me most was that Plaud didn’t always return long paragraphs. Whenever possible, it organized the answers into tables with priorities, making them much faster to review and act on.

Built-in voice editor

While testing Plaud, I also discovered its built-in voice editor. It lets you trim recordings, remove silence, and delete unnecessary sections before sharing them.

I mainly used it when I wanted to clean up a brainstorming session before sending it to my team. Although I didn’t rely on this feature every day, I still found it a valuable addition because I haven’t seen many AI note-takers include this type of editing directly inside the app.

Mind maps and AI templates

Plaud offers much more than a standard AI summary. Besides generating transcripts and meeting notes, it can also create mind maps from your conversations, which I found useful for visualizing ideas and brainstorming sessions.

I also liked that Plaud offers a wide range of AI templates. Depending on the conversation, I could generate meeting minutes, highlights, quantitative analysis, intent analysis, concept insights, and many other summary formats without rewriting anything manually.

Offline recording

Unlike most AI note-takers I’ve tested, Plaud can record even without an internet connection. I particularly liked this because I could capture ideas anywhere without worrying about connectivity.

Once I was back online, Plaud automatically synced the recording, generated the transcript, and created the AI summary. Combined with the dedicated hardware, this made it one of the easiest tools I’ve used for capturing ideas while traveling or commuting.

Plans & value

Fellow’s cost breakdown

Fellow offers four plans. The Free plan includes access to AI recording, recaps, and transcriptions. Additionally, it provides access to features such as collaborative meeting notes, meeting agendas, meeting timers, and integrations with Zoom, Slack, Microsoft Teams, and Google Meet.

However, the free tier only includes five recordings per month, so heavy users will likely outgrow it quickly.

The Team plan was developed for small teams and starts with 3 users. It includes all the features in the Free plan with higher limits and offers meeting automation tools and additional integrations with Notion or project management tools.

The Business plan starts with 3 users and provides unlimited recordings, transcription minutes, organization-wide meeting templates, sales AI recap templates, and more integrations.

The Enterprise plan offers advanced control, security, and AI meeting support. With this plan, you can create customized rules for recording and have more recordings and transcription minutes.

Explore our Apps directory

A curated directory of software tools we’ve independently reviewed, with links to full reviews, comparisons, and category guides.

Explore Apps directory

Plaud’s cost breakdown

Before using Plaud, you’ll need to purchase a device, which starts at $159 and goes up to around $189, depending on the model.

The hardware is a one-time investment, while the subscription determines how many transcription minutes and AI features you’ll have access to.

The free plan includes 300 transcription minutes per month, making it a good option if you only record occasionally. Pro costs $8.33/month and increases the monthly limit to 1,200 transcription minutes, which should be enough for most users.

If you record throughout the day, the Unlimited plan removes transcription limits for $19.99/month. Businesses can also choose the Team plan for $20/month, which includes centralized billing, user management, and priority support.

Compared to other AI note-takers, I found Plaud’s subscription pricing competitive. The main consideration is the upfront hardware purchase, which makes it more expensive than software-only alternatives.

However, after carrying the NotePin for a few weeks, I found it more convenient than pulling out my phone every time I wanted to capture an idea or record a conversation. If you regularly have in-person meetings, phone calls, or brainstorm while commuting, the dedicated recorder can easily justify the extra cost.

That hardware-first approach makes a lot of sense for individual professionals, but it may be less practical for organizations looking to standardize AI meeting tools across teams. In those cases, software-based platforms that can be centrally deployed, managed, and governed are often a better fit.

User interface

Fellow’s user interface

Fellow has a simple and clean user interface. It’s particularly great that you can access many features from the homepage with just a few clicks.

I used this tool’s desktop version, which you can easily download from Fellow’s website. The desktop app helps you make the meeting experience smooth from beginning to end.

Use this link to sign up and get 10% off the paid plans if you upgrade.

Plaud’s user interface

The Plaud app itself is really straightforward and has no learning curve at all. Within a few minutes, I knew where everything was.

Nonetheless, the setup process of the Plaud device took more time than I expected. It took me around 10–15 minutes to figure out because the recording button required a firmer press than I anticipated. After my first day of use, it became second nature.

Wins & Trade-Offs of Fellow

Fellow wins

You can choose whether you want bot-free or bot meeting recordings
Enterprise-grade security (offers privacy controls and never trains on your data)
Offers transcript redaction
Robust integrations with project management and CRM tools
MCP Server (integration with LLMs like ChatGPT, Claude, and Perplexity)
API for custom workflows
Very accurate real-time transcription
It offers numerous productivity tools like pre-meeting briefs, meeting agendas, Ask Fellow, and AI note templates, besides the essential features
The AI summaries are super helpful and include all the relevant points
A budget-friendly option for teams

Fellow trade-offs

You need to install the Fellow desktop app in order to use botless recording

Pros and cons of Plaud

Plaud pros

One-button recording made capturing ideas effortless.
Excellent transcription accuracy, even in challenging recording conditions.
Well-structured AI summaries.
Ask Plaud answered questions from meetings in seconds.
Built-in voice editor for trimming recordings.
Offline recording support.
Lightweight, comfortable design.

Plaud cons

No conversation intelligence or coaching features.
The initial setup was less intuitive than expected.
No quick way to assign AI-generated action items to teammates.
The dedicated hardware is only worth it if you record frequently.

Alternatives to Fellow and Plaud

If you are not sure if Plaud and Fellow are the best choice for you, here are some:

App	Best for	Description
Notta	Best for multi-language transcription	A unique AI note-taker that allows multi-language transcription, enabling people to speak two different languages during online meetings. Full Notta review \| Quick Notta overview
Fathom	Best free AI note-taker	An accurate AI note-taker with an extensive free plan. Full Fathom review \| Quick Fathom overview
MeetGeek	Best for multi-language transcription	A versatile AI note-taking app with the best AI meeting summaries. Full MeetGeek review \| Quick MeetGeek overview
tl;dv	Best simple AI note-taker	A simple option for individuals with a feature-rich free plan. Full tl;dv review \| Quicktl;dv overview
Radiant	Best free AI note-taker for Mac	It is a 100% free AI bot-less note-taker for Mac users for in-person and online meetings. Full Radiant review \| Quick Radiant overview
Otter AI	A popular AI note-taker	One of the most popular AI note-takers for Google Meet, Zoom, and Microsoft Teams. Full Otter AI review \| Quick Otter AI overview
Granola	Best for users need a simple bot-less AI note-taker	Granola is a lightweight AI note-taking app that transcribes and summarizes meetings without bots, with a generous free tier, but it’s basic and lacks advanced features. Full Granola review \| Quick Granola overview
Krisp	Best bot-less AI note-taker supporting high audio quality	Krisp is a Voice AI platform for clearer communication and more productive meetings, combining real-time audio enhancements with AI note-taking. Full Krisp review \| Quick Krisp overview
Bluedot	An easy-to-use bot-less AI note-taker	Bluedot is a straightforward and easy-to-use bot-free AI note-taker. Full Bluedot review \| Quick Bluedot overview
Zoom AI Companion	Best for Zoom users needing built-in AI note-taking	A solid built-in AI assistant for Zoom that offers meeting summaries, basic transcription, and action items, but lacks advanced features. Full Zoom AI Companion review \| Quick Zoom AI Companion overview

My pick: Fellow vs Plaud

After testing both tools, my pick in this Fellow vs Plaud comparison is Fellow.

It goes beyond AI meeting notes by combining accurate transcription with collaboration, flexible recording options, and organization-wide governance.

That said, Plaud genuinely impressed me with its one-button recording, accurate transcription, and the convenience of carrying a dedicated recorder throughout the day. It’s one of the best solutions I’ve tested for capturing conversations, phone calls, and ideas away from a desk.

The biggest difference comes down to who each product is designed for.

Fellow is built for organizations that need secure AI meeting intelligence, centralized ownership of meeting data, and enterprise governance. Plaud, on the other hand, is built for individuals who want the fastest and most convenient way to capture conversations wherever they happen.

If your work revolves around team meetings and collaboration, choose Fellow. If you regularly record in-person conversations, phone calls, or ideas on the go, Plaud is the better fit.

Looking for similar tools?

Visit our AI note-takers library to explore other apps we’ve reviewed in this space and how they compare.

See overview

Why you can trust our reviews

Our mission? No fluff, no shortcuts—just honest, hands-on insights from productivity pros.

Discover how we stay transparent, read our review methodology, and let us know about any tools we missed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Plaud Note worth buying over a software-only AI note taker?

It depends on how you work. If you regularly record phone calls, in-person conversations, or capture ideas throughout the day, Plaud Note or Plaud NotePin can be worth the investment because the dedicated voice recorder makes recording much faster than reaching for your phone.

If you mainly attend online meetings and want advanced collaboration features, a software-based AI note taker like Fellow will likely provide better value.

Does Plaud support real-time transcription?

No. Unlike AI meeting assistants that generate real-time transcription during online meetings, Plaud processes the recording after it’s uploaded. During my testing, it usually took around 5–10 minutes to generate accurate transcripts, AI summaries, and meeting notes, depending on the recording length.

Can Fellow and Plaud record phone calls and virtual meetings?

Yes, but they do it differently. Fellow is designed for virtual meetings and integrates with platforms like Google Meet, Zoom, and Microsoft Teams, while also offering botless desktop capture.

Plaud, on the other hand, is built around dedicated hardware that lets you record phone calls, in-person conversations, and voice notes without relying on meeting bots.

What advanced AI features does Fellow offer that Plaud doesn’t?

Both tools generate meeting notes, transcripts, and AI summaries, but Fellow includes several advanced AI features designed for teams.

These include collaborative meeting agendas, AI meeting briefs, action item management, organization-wide search with Ask Fellow, CRM integrations, and the ability to create meeting clips.

Plaud focuses more on recording conversations and organizing them with summaries, mind maps, and Ask Plaud rather than Fellow’s organization-wide meeting intelligence.

Does Plaud offer a free plan?

Yes. Plaud offers free transcription through its Starter plan, which includes 300 transcription minutes per month.

If you need more recording time, you can upgrade to the Pro plan, which is billed annually, or choose the Unlimited subscription. Keep in mind that you’ll also need to purchase a Plaud device before using the service.

The post Fellow vs Plaud: The Biggest Differences Between a Virtual and a Physical Notetaker appeared first on .

What I Learned After Carrying Plaud Every Day (Plaud Review 2026)

Aron Kantor — Fri, 31 Jul 2026 20:35:26 +0000

While I have tested 20+ AI note-takers so far, this Plaud review will be different. I not only used my Plaud NotePin for my meetings but also wore it and carried it with me every day for a week.

I used it when driving, commuting, or just capturing my ideas. So, basically everywhere.

Stay here, because I will break down how it performed day-to-day and reveal where it worked and where it failed.

Let’s dive in!

TL;DR: Should You Buy or Skip Plaud?

Best for: Professionals, founders, and consultants who frequently record in-person meetings, phone calls, and ideas on the go
Not ideal for: Users who only attend virtual meetings or don’t need a dedicated recording device
Biggest strength: Effortless wearable recording with accurate AI summaries and transcription
Biggest weakness: Lacks advanced conversation intelligence and coaching analytics

Verdict: A premium AI note-taker that combines a voice memo app with reliable transcription and AI summaries, making it one of the best solutions for capturing conversations beyond virtual meetings.
Score: 4.5 / 5

Tested with our review & scoring methodology Real-world testing Unbiased evaluation

Plaud Review

Aron Kantor

Transcription & recording

AI meeting notes

Collaboration features

Other capabilities

Integrations

User interface

Paid plans

Free plan

Privacy and safety

My experience

Summary

Plaud offers a unique combination of wearable recording, reliable AI transcription, and detailed meeting summaries. It delivers an excellent experience for recording in-person meetings, phone calls, and everyday ideas, although it lacks advanced conversation intelligence features.

4.5

pros

	One-button recording
	Excellent transcription accuracy
	Well-structured AI summaries
	Ask Plaud feature
	Built-in voice editor
	Offline recording support
	Lightweight, comfortable design

cons

	No conversation intelligence or coaching features
	The initial setup was less intuitive than expected
	No quick way to assign AI-generated action items to teammates
	The dedicated hardware is only worth it if you record frequently

How We Test AI Note-Takers

To keep our reviews and final scores fair and consistent, we evaluate every AI note-taking tool using a standardized testing framework built on real-world usage and hands-on experience.

We evaluate every AI note-taking tool using this weighted framework, based on hands-on testing in real meetings and everyday workflows.

Our scoring breakdown after testing 20+ AI note-takers:

Features & functionality — 50%
User interface — 10%
Pricing — 20%
Security — 10%
Real-world experience — 10%

Want a detailed breakdown of how we test each category?

Learn exactly how we test tools → Review methodology

Short on time? Here’s a quick overview of Plaud

What Impressed Me (and What Didn’t)

This is where Plaud genuinely impressed me or saved a lot of time:

One-button recording made capturing ideas effortless, especially while driving or commuting, without reaching for my phone.
Excellent transcription accuracy, even for Hungarian conversations and recordings with background noise.
Well-structured AI summaries that highlighted the key discussion points and action items without reading the full transcript.
Ask Plaud became one of my favorite features, as it answered questions from meetings in seconds and often presented the results in easy-to-read tables.
Built-in voice editor for trimming recordings and removing silence before sharing ideas with my team.
Offline recording support, so I could capture ideas anywhere and sync them later.
Lightweight, comfortable design that became as natural to wear as a watch after a few days.

This is where Plaud did not perform that well:

No conversation intelligence or coaching features such as talk-time analysis, filler-word detection, speaking ratio, or sales coaching.
The initial setup was less intuitive than expected—it took me around 10–15 minutes to get the device working because the recording button required a firmer press than I anticipated.
No quick way to assign AI-generated action items to teammates directly from meeting notes.
The dedicated hardware is only worth it if you record frequently. If you mainly attend virtual meetings or rarely capture ideas on the go, a software-only AI note-taker may provide better value.

How Plaud Fits Into My Daily Workflow (Detailed Review)

Here, I guide you through the daily workflows where I mainly used Plaud.

Recording meetings and phone calls

Where It Saved Me Time

Plaud consistently turned my recordings into well-structured summaries that were easy to skim and act on.

Plaud prepares AI meeting notes with key points and next arrangements. Depending on the recording length, it usually took 5–10 minutes to upload, transcribe, and generate the AI summary.

The structured notes provide you with a quick overview of what you discussed, and Plaud picked up the relevant points from my meetings and phone calls well.

I could add, remove, or rewrite points, and even generate different versions using built-in templates such as meeting minutes, highlights, quantitative analysis, intent analysis, or concept insights. Nevertheless, there are many other templates you can use.

Since Plaud supports many languages, I also tested it in my native language, Hungarian. I was genuinely impressed by how accurately it transcribed conversations and generated summaries, despite Hungarian being a challenging language for most AI note-takers.

The automatically generated mind maps gave me a quick visual overview of longer discussions.

Furthermore, Plaud generates mind maps from your discussions, which is a useful feature for visual thinkers. However, the feature I used most is Ask Plaud.

Instead of searching through long transcripts, I simply asked questions and got clear answers in seconds.

Instead of searching through the transcript manually, I simply asked questions like:

What deadlines were mentioned?
What tasks do I need to complete this week?
What decisions were made during the meeting?

The responses were generated in just a few seconds. What impressed me most was that Plaud didn’t always return long paragraphs. When possible, it organized the answers into tables with priorities, making them much faster to review and act on.

Where It Struggled

In terms of AI-generated summaries and transcription, Plaud did an excellent job. The main feature I missed is a conversational intelligence tool to analyze my calls.

As someone who enjoys analyzing my own meetings, I’d love to see insights such as:

speaking vs. listening ratio,
filler words,
talk time,
sentiment trends,
coaching recommendations,
objection analysis for sales calls.

These kinds of analytics would make Plaud even more valuable for sales professionals, managers, and anyone looking to continuously improve their communication skills.

Brainstorming While Driving

Where It Saved Me Time

Compared to most AI note-takers, which require you to take out your phone, open the app, and start recording, Plaud made capturing ideas much faster. I simply pressed the button on my NotePin and started talking, which felt both quicker and safer, especially while driving.

I often recorded longer monologues with short pauses in between, and Plaud did a great job organizing the transcription into logical blocks instead of one long wall of text.

I liked how Plaud cleaned up filler words while still keeping the transcript natural and easy to follow.

While the AI notes covered most of what I talked about, the transcription outline helped me find some of the key ideas I had, so I could read them completely and ensure I could follow that line of thinking.

The built-in editor made it easy to trim recordings before sharing my ideas with the team.

One example was when I came up with a new idea for Floviu while driving and wanted to share it with my developer. This is when I found its built-in voice editor that allows me to remove silence, trim, and delete parts of the voice recording.

Although I did not use this feature more than once, it can still be a valuable addition for these workflows, and no other AI note-takers offer this.

Finally, Plaud let me organize my recordings into different folders. So, I could create folders for different topics and save my brainstorming in the related folder.

Where It Struggled

Honestly, I didn’t run into any significant issues using Plaud to capture ideas while driving. Nonetheless, if you rarely record ideas or conversations throughout the day, you probably won’t benefit from carrying a dedicated device instead of using your phone.

Capturing Ideas on the Go

Where It Saved Me Time

One thing I quickly appreciated about Plaud was how effortless it was to capture ideas. I simply clipped the NotePin to my T-shirt, pressed the record button, and started talking. It just makes it easy and convenient to grasp an idea without unlocking my phone.

The combination of searchable transcripts and Ask Plaud made reviewing longer recordings much faster.

I used my NotePin numerous times while commuting, and even in noisy environments, Plaud captured what I said. The transcription accuracy was high, and I particularly valued that Plaud cleaned my transcript, so there were no filler words.

Its summarization features were a huge time-saver for me, since they quickly broke down the key action items from 15-20 minutes of brainstorming, during which at least 10 minutes were irrelevant.

Lastly, I loved that Plaud NotePin can record offline too.

Where It Struggled

The one thing I missed here is the option to quickly assign action points to my team members. For example, sometimes I come up with content ideas, and it would be useful for me to quickly pin my team to work on it.

Design, Battery Life & Everyday Use

After a few days, wearing the NotePin felt as natural as putting on a watch.

As mentioned, I used Plaud NotePin. Its design is minimalist, premium, and subtle. Since I chose a color close to my T-shirts, it blended in nicely instead of drawing attention, which I personally preferred.

The Plaud app itself is really straightforward and has no learning curve at all. Within a few minutes, I knew where everything was.

Nonetheless, the setup process of the Plaud device took more time than I expected. I first had to fully charge the device, and during my first recording, I repeatedly tapped the record button without realizing it required a firmer press to start recording.

Honestly, it took 10-15 minutes to figure out, which was a bit frustrating, but after my first day of use, it became second nature. The device shows the recording status (a red light indicates recording), so you will always know when it’s on.

Based on my experience, the battery life of my Plaud NotePin was somewhere between 20 – 35 hours depending on how much time I recorded. Nonetheless, the device does not show the battery status.

A quick note on shipping. I ordered it from Hungary, Europe, and it took around 5-7 workdays to receive it. I know it can vary significantly depending on your location, but I had a good experience here.

Overall, Plaud has exceptional design, and after a few days, wearing the NotePin became as natural as putting on a watch.

Explore our Apps directory

A curated directory of software tools we’ve independently reviewed, with links to full reviews, comparisons, and category guides.

Explore Apps directory

What You Need to Know About Pricing

Before using Plaud, you must purchase the device and select a plan.

Let’s start with the devices!

Devices

Plaud offers several devices, but the lightweight NotePin was my favorite for everyday recording.

The one I used (Plaud NotePin) is the lightweight version that includes a magnetic pin and clip, ideal for everyday wearable capturing. Above, I already described how effortless it was to wear and use it on a daily basis, so I had a great experience with NotePin.

Plaud also offers other device options for different use cases. The NotePin S is a refreshed version of the NotePin with a slightly different design. Since I haven’t tested it myself, I can’t comment on its real-world performance.

For users who frequently record phone calls, Plaud offers the Plaud Note, a card-sized recorder that lets you switch between phone call and in-person recording modes. The Plaud Note Pro is the company’s most advanced AI note taker and comes as a magnetic phone case with additional recording capabilities.

Subscription plans

Plaud’s subscription plans are competitively priced, although you’ll also need to factor in the hardware cost.

The free Starter plan includes 300 transcription minutes per month, making it a good option if you only record occasionally.

The Pro plan is $8.33 per month with annual billing and includes 1,200 transcription minutes per month. Based on my experience, it should be enough for most users.

For heavy users, Plaud also offers an Unlimited plan for $19.99/month (annual billing), which removes the transcription limit. This is the plan I used during my testing.

Also, Plaud offers a Team plan for $20 per user per month with annual billing that includes centralized billing, user management, priority support, and more.

Cost vs. value

Compared to other AI transcription tools, Plaud’s subscription pricing is competitive. There are cheaper, but significantly more expensive AI note-takers.

The main consideration is that, unlike purely software-based alternatives, you’ll need to purchase the hardware as well.

While that increases the upfront cost, I found it more convenient to wear a dedicated recorder than to use my phone for call recording. This can be especially useful for professionals who have numerous in-person conversations and phone calls each day.

How Secure Is Plaud?

Plaud meets major security and privacy standards, making it a reliable choice for handling sensitive conversations.

The short answer: Plaud is a secure AI note-taking platform that complies with major security and privacy standards, including ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 27701:2019, GDPR, SOC 2 Type II, and HIPAA.

The main consideration isn’t the platform itself, but how you use it. When recording in-person meetings or phone calls, it’s your responsibility to inform participants and comply with applicable local laws and company policies.

Unlike many AI meeting assistants for online meetings, Plaud doesn’t automatically notify others that a recording is taking place.

Final thoughts

If you mainly attend virtual meetings, a traditional AI meeting assistant may already cover your needs. But if your day involves in-person meetings, phone calls, commuting, or capturing ideas on the go, Plaud offers a noticeably smoother experience than reaching for your phone every time.

Looking for similar tools?

Visit our AI note-takers library to explore other apps we’ve reviewed in this space and how they compare.

See overview

Why you can trust our reviews

Our mission? No fluff, no shortcuts—just honest, hands-on insights from productivity pros.

Discover how we stay transparent, read our review methodology, and let us know about any tools we missed.

Frequently asked questions

Is Plaud Note worth the investment?

I would recommend Plaud to professionals, founders, consultants, and entrepreneurs who regularly have important conversations and want a reliable way to ensure no valuable ideas, action items, or decisions are forgotten.

For them, Plaud Note definitely is worth the investment.

Is using Plaud legal?

Yes, Plaud complies with all the major regulations, including ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 27701:2019, GDPR, SOC 2 Type II, and HIPAA.

Is Fireflies AI or Plaud better?

The answer completely depends on your use case. If you have numerous in-person meetings, phone calls, and love to capture ideas while commuting or driving, Plaud is a more capable solution, as it can replace your voice memo app and AI note-taker at once.

However, if you only have virtual meetings and don’t want to invest heavily, Fireflies AI is a more practical choice.

The post What I Learned After Carrying Plaud Every Day (Plaud Review 2026) appeared first on .

The 4 Biggest Takeaways From My Copper CRM Review

Aron Kantor — Fri, 24 Jul 2026 16:39:22 +0000

Copper is often recommended as the CRM for Google Workspace users, but after testing it myself, I realized there’s much more to the story.

During my Copper CRM review, I found four things that most reviews barely mention:

Teams don’t choose Copper because it has more CRM features, but because it keeps them inside Gmail.
Copper is especially popular with startups because it’s quick to roll out and easy for new teams to adopt.
The biggest frustrations aren’t usually about the CRM itself, but about pricing and seat management as teams grow.
Copper works best for businesses already committed to Google Workspace, but it’s a much harder sell for Microsoft 365 teams.

I wanted to see whether those patterns matched my own experience, so I tested Copper’s contact management, pipeline management, automation, reporting, integrations, and pricing.

For more insights from my hands-on testing, keep reading this Copper CRM review.

Verdict

Here’s the quick verdict if you don’t want to read the full review:

Best for: Small to midsize businesses already using Google Workspace that want an intuitive CRM with strong pipeline management and automation.
Not ideal for: Teams looking for a free CRM or advanced reporting on a lower-priced plan.
Biggest strength: Seamless Google Workspace integration paired with a clean, easy-to-use interface.
Biggest weakness: Many advanced features, including Custom Reports, are only available on the expensive Business plan.

Verdict: If your team works in Google Workspace, it offers an excellent balance of usability, automation, and integrations, though you’ll need the Business plan to unlock its full potential.
Score: 4.4 / 5

Tested with our review & scoring methodology Real-world testing Unbiased evaluation

Copper CRM

Review

Contact & lead management

Pipeline & deal tracking

Other features

User interface

Integrations

Pricing

Platform and language support

Free plan

My experience

Summary

Copper CRM is an intuitive CRM built around Google Workspace, offering excellent contact management, flexible pipelines, and powerful automation. It stands out for its ease of use and seamless Gmail integration, though the lack of a free plan and Business-only advanced features make it a better fit for teams already invested in the Google ecosystem.

4.4

pros

	Clean and intuitive interface
	Excellent Google Workspace integration with Gmail, Calendar, Drive, and Contacts
	Flexible pipeline templates
	Well-organized contact and opportunity records
	Built-in email, task, and workflow automation

cons

	No free plan
	Custom Reports are only available on the Business plan
	Business plan pricing increases significantly as your team grows
	Fewer advanced reporting and customization options than enterprise CRMs like Salesforce or HubSpot

How We Test CRM Apps

To keep our reviews and final scores fair and consistent, we evaluate every CRM app using a standardized testing framework based on real-world sales workflows and hands-on testing.

We evaluate every CRM app using this weighted framework, based on hands-on testing in real meetings and everyday workflows.

Our scoring breakdown after testing 10+ CRM apps:

Features & functionality — 60%
User interface — 10%
Pricing — 10%
Security — 10%
Real-world experience — 10%

Want a detailed breakdown of how we test each category?

Learn exactly how we test tools → Review methodology

Short on time? Here’s a quick overview of Copper

What is Copper CRM?

Copper focuses on bringing contacts, deals, and communication together in a Google Workspace-first CRM.

Copper CRM is a cloud-based customer relationship management platform designed to help businesses manage contacts, leads, deals, and projects in one place.

Unlike many traditional CRMs, it’s built specifically for Google Workspace, allowing teams to work directly from Gmail, Google Calendar, and Google Drive.

It’s used by more than 30,000 companies across 100+ countries.

Testing Copper CRM: My experience

Getting started with Copper didn’t take long. After creating my account, I was able to import contacts, build a test pipeline, and start exploring the platform without needing much setup.

As I spent more time with the CRM, I appreciated how consistent the experience remained across different sections. Whether I was managing contacts, working with deals, or exploring automation, the overall layout stayed familiar.

The only limitation I ran into during testing was that some advanced functionality wasn’t included in my trial. Aside from that, testing the platform was straightforward, especially since it’s designed to work closely with Google Workspace.

Why did it get a 4.7 / 5?

Copper stood out for its clean interface, intuitive navigation, and seamless Google Workspace integration. Creating pipelines, managing contacts, and setting up automations all felt straightforward, while the wide range of native integrations adds even more flexibility.

The main drawback is that several advanced features, including Custom Reports, are limited to the Business plan. Combined with the lack of a free plan and the higher cost of Business, these limitations kept Copper from earning a perfect score.

Who should use Copper CRM

Teams that already use Google Workspace and want a CRM that works seamlessly with Gmail, Google Calendar, and Google Drive.
Small to midsize businesses looking for an intuitive CRM with a short learning curve.
Sales teams that need flexible pipeline management and built-in automation.
Businesses that want native integrations with popular tools and access to thousands more through Zapier.

Who should consider alternatives

Teams looking for a free CRM.
Businesses that need advanced reporting without paying for an enterprise-tier plan.
Organizations that primarily use Microsoft 365 instead of Google Workspace.
Companies that require advanced CRM customization or highly complex sales workflows.

A closer look at Copper CRM

Contact management

I imported test contacts and found it easy to browse and organize them in one place.

The first thing I tested in Copper was contact management, since that’s the foundation of any CRM.

Adding contacts is straightforward. Copper separates everything into People and Companies, and you can create either one with a few clicks. The form itself is simple, asking for the basics first, while additional information can be added later.

If you’re migrating from another CRM or already have an existing contact database, Copper also supports importing contacts from Excel, CSV, Google Contacts, Google Sheets, and several popular CRMs. I imported my test contacts from an Excel spreadsheet, and the process was easy to follow.

I could manage emails, tasks, files, and activity history without leaving the contact record.

Opening a contact gives you much more than a profile page. Everything is centered around an activity timeline that records what happened and when. From the same screen, I could log phone calls, create notes, send emails, and see previous interactions.

The contact record also displays assigned tasks, pipeline records, and related files, so all the information tied to that customer stays in one place.

Copper also includes email tracking through its Chrome extension, letting you see when contacts open your emails directly from the CRM.

Pipeline management

I explored several ready-made templates before building my own custom pipeline.

Before building my own pipeline, I spent some time exploring Copper’s templates. There are options for much more than sales, including customer onboarding, account renewals, customer support, project management, recruitment, partnerships, fundraising, and real estate.

I started with the Sales template, then created a Projects pipeline to see how it was structured. After that, I built a pipeline from scratch, which let me customize every stage and get a better sense of how flexible the setup process is.

I tested both pipeline views and mostly used the board to move opportunities between stages.

Once everything was set up, I started adding opportunities to see how Copper handles deals. Each opportunity can be linked to a company and individual contacts while storing details like the expected value, close date, owner, and status.

Opening an opportunity gives you the same workspace as a contact record. I could log calls, create notes, send emails, add follow-up tasks, and review previous activity without leaving the deal page.

I also switched between the two available pipeline views while testing. I mostly used the Board to move opportunities through different stages, but the List view made it easier to scan key details.

Task management

I created follow-up tasks and liked that every change was automatically logged in the activity timeline.

Copper also includes built-in task management, so you can plan follow-ups.

I could create tasks directly from a contact record, assign them, set a due date, and choose a priority level.

I also liked that every task-related action is recorded in the activity timeline. Creating a task, assigning it, or changing its priority is automatically logged, giving you a clear history of what has happened with each customer.

Automation

I tested all three automation types to see how they handled different workflows.

Copper separates automation into three categories: Email Automation, Workflow Automation, and Task Automation, each designed for a different type of workflow.

Email Automation comes with ready-made templates. There are templates for automatically following up with inactive contacts, emailing people in saved filters, reaching out to a company’s primary contact, or sending emails when a pipeline record reaches a specific stage or is closed.

Next, I looked at Task Automation. Instead of manually creating recurring follow-ups, I could define a trigger, choose the entity it applies to, and configure the task that should be created.

The setup also lets you specify details like the activity type, due date, reminder, owner, priority, visibility, tags, and description before the automation runs.

Finally, I tested Workflow Automation, which uses a trigger-and-action builder. In my case, I created a workflow that starts when a pipeline record is created and automatically generates a related task.

Copper also lets you add trigger conditions, combine multiple rules with AND, OR, or custom logic, and configure additional actions from the same workflow.

If your team already uses Gmail, Copper’s Gmail integration makes these automations even more useful by keeping email activity connected to your contacts and workflows.

Reports

I generated sample pipeline reports using the opportunities I created during testing.

Once I had a few opportunities in my pipeline, I switched to Pipeline Reports to see how Copper visualizes sales data.

The default report gives a stage-by-stage breakdown of your pipeline, showing the total pipeline value, number of opportunities, and how deals are distributed across each stage.

Below the chart, Copper generates a table with more detailed metrics for each stage. Since I had already created opportunities during testing, the reports updated automatically with my sample data.

I also explored the Custom Reports section, but it wasn’t available on my trial account. Copper requires the Business plan to build custom reports, dashboards, and more advanced analytics.

Copper CRM integrations

I explored Copper’s integrations and found Google Workspace at the center of the experience.

One of Copper’s biggest strengths is how closely it’s built around Google Workspace. Copper integrates with Gmail, Google Calendar, Google Drive, and Google Contacts and available on every plan, so the CRM fits naturally into an existing Google-based workflow.

Beyond Google Workspace, Copper supports integrations with tools like Mailchimp, QuickBooks Online, Slack, DocuSign, PandaDoc, Dropbox, Zendesk, RingCentral, and Xero, with access to 9,000+ additional app integrations through Zapier, plus custom integrations via the Copper API.

Copper CRM user interface

Copper has a very clean interface. The left sidebar keeps every major section within easy reach, while the top search bar makes it quick to find people, companies, or opportunities from anywhere in the CRM.

I also liked that the layout stays consistent across different records. Whether I opened a contact, company, or opportunity, the overall structure remained the same, so I didn’t have to relearn where to find activities, notes, tasks, or emails.

Copper CRM pricing plans

Comparing the plans made it clear that the biggest differences appear in the higher pricing tiers.

Copper offers three paid plans along with a 14-day free trial.

The Basic plan starts at $23 per user/month when billed annually. It includes up to 2,500 contacts, pipelines, project management, contact enrichment, and task automation.

Upgrading to Professional costs $59 per user/month annually and increases the contact limit to 15,000 while adding workflow automation, reporting, bulk email, and third-party integrations.

The Business plan is $99 per user/month with annual billing. It removes contact limits and unlocks advanced features like custom reports, email series, multi-currency support, and premium support.

What Copper CRM does well and where it falls short

Pros and cons of Copper CRM

Clean and intuitive interface
Excellent Google Workspace integration with Gmail, Calendar, Drive, and Contacts
Flexible pipeline templates
Well-organized contact and opportunity records
Built-in email, task, and workflow automation

Limitations

No free plan
Custom Reports are only available on the Business plan
Business plan pricing increases significantly as your team grows
Fewer advanced reporting and customization options than enterprise CRMs like Salesforce or HubSpot

Copper CRM alternatives

If you’re still unsure whether this is the right CRM tool for you, we’ve got you! Here are some solid Copper CRM alternatives worth considering:

App	Best for	Description
Pipedrive	Best for sales-focused teams	Pipedrive is a sales-focused CRM built for managing deals and moving leads through a clear visual pipeline. Full Pipedrive review \| Quick Pipedrive overview
Nutshell	Best for simple all-in-one CRM	Nutshell is a well-rounded CRM that brings contact management, pipeline tracking, and communication tools into one place. Full Nutshell review \| Quick Nutshell overview
HubSpot	Best for all-in-one CRM	HubSpot is an all-in-one CRM that combines sales, marketing, and automation in one platform, with a strong free plan and solid core features. Full HubSpot review \| Quick HubSpot overview
Zoho CRM	Best budget-friendly CRM	A flexible CRM platform with a wide range of features, including automation, analytics, and customization options. Often used by businesses looking for a more affordable all-in-one solution. Check out Zoho CRM
Salesforce	Best for enterprise teams	A highly customizable CRM designed for large organizations, offering advanced automation, reporting, and integration capabilities across complex business processes. Check out Salesforce
Monday CRM	Best for visual workflows	A visual CRM built on a flexible workspace, allowing teams to manage pipelines, tasks, and processes in a highly customizable way. Check out Monday CRM

Wrap up: Copper CRM Review 2026

After testing every major feature for this Copper CRM review, I can see why Copper has built a loyal user base. It’s simple to learn, well organized, and integrates naturally with Google Workspace, though you’ll need a higher-tier plan to access some of its best features.

If your business already runs on Google Workspace, Copper is one of the easiest CRMs to adopt. If not, I’d compare it against HubSpot or Pipedrive before making a decision.

Explore our Apps directory

A curated directory of software tools we’ve independently reviewed, with links to full reviews, comparisons, and category guides.

Explore Apps directory

Why you can trust our reviews

At thebusinessdive.com, our team tests, reviews, and compares hundreds of productivity apps every year — from project management tools to note-taking apps. We dive deep into real-world use cases to help you find the right tools that actually improve your workflow, not just add noise.

Our mission? No fluff, no shortcuts—just honest, hands-on insights from productivity pros.

Discover how we stay transparent, read our review methodology, and let us know about any tools we missed.

Frequently asked questions

Is Copper CRM a good choice for Google Workspace users?

Yes. Copper is the only CRM recommended by Google Workspace and is built specifically for teams that rely heavily on Gmail, Google Calendar, Google Drive, and other Google tools.

Its Google Workspace integration reduces manual data entry, automatically enriches customer data through the Chrome extension, and helps sales teams manage contacts, lead tracking, and client communication without constantly switching between multiple tools.

What does Copper CRM help sales teams with?

Copper CRM helps sales reps manage the entire sales process, from lead management and contact management to tracking multiple deals in a sales pipeline.

It also includes workflow automation, basic automation, follow ups, contact enrichment, and automated reminders for inactive new leads, making it easier to keep track of customer interactions while reducing administrative work.

How much does Copper CRM cost?

The Copper CRM cost starts at $9 per user/month for the Starter plan, followed by Basic, Professional, and Business plans. The Professional plan adds features like reporting and workflow automation, while the Professional and Business plans unlock more advanced capabilities.

As your team grows, pricing can increase significantly, so it’s worth comparing the included features before choosing a plan.

The post The 4 Biggest Takeaways From My Copper CRM Review appeared first on .

Fellow vs Jamie 2026: Head-to-Head

Aron Kantor — Fri, 24 Jul 2026 14:05:23 +0000

Fellow and Jamie have a lot in common.

So why compare them?

Because even though they solve the same problem, they take very different approaches:

Fellow is an AI meeting note taker built with security and compliance at its core.
Jamie focuses on bot-free AI meeting notes.
Fellow offers collaborative agendas, AI connectors, and integrations with the tools your team already uses.
Jamie provides a simpler, more lightweight meeting experience.
Fellow gives you the choice between bot and bot-free recording.
Jamie hosts data exclusively in the EU
Jamie deletes the audio immediately after transcription.
Fellow offers the option to retain video and audio, or delete them entirely, with zero-day retention.
My personal recommendation is Fellow, as it fits better with my daily use and my data retention preferences.

If one of those approaches already sounds like a better fit, your decision might be easy.

If not, keep reading this Fellow vs Jamie review, where I’ll compare their features, pricing, user interface, strengths, weaknesses, and my hands-on experience with both tools.

Let’s dive in!

Verdict

Here’s the quick verdict if you don’t want to read the full Jamie vs Fellow review:

Best for:
Fellow: Teams & professionals that need an advanced and safe AI note-taker
Jamie: Individuals and teams that just want AI meeting notes without meeting bots.

Not ideal for:
Fellow: Free AI note-taking
Jamie: Teams that need collaborative meeting agendas and enterprise-grade security and compliance features.

Biggest strength:
Fellow: One of the most accurate meeting transcriptions & meeting notes. Plus granular control for IT and Compliance over what gets recorded, retained, and deleted.
Jamie: Bot-free recording with excellent AI meeting summaries.

Biggest weakness:
Fellow: The free version is more like a trial
Jamie: Requires the desktop app and lacks collaborative meeting management features.

Verdict:
Fellow is the better choice for teams that need advanced meeting transcription and security controls, while Jamie is ideal for users who simply want accurate AI meeting notes without meeting bots.

Winner:
Fellow is the better choice for industries needing recording flexibility and compliance control – with options for bot or bot-free recording, zero-day retention, and granular redaction. Jamie excels for users seeking simple, bot-free AI notes with EU data residency.

Tested with our review & scoring methodology Real-world testing Unbiased evaluation

My ratings: Fellow vs Jamie

Fellow

Review

Transcription & recording

AI meeting notes

Collaboration features

Other capabilities

Integrations

User interface

Paid plans

Free plan

Privacy and safety

My experience

4.5

pros

	Accurate transcriptions and summaries
	Bot and Bot-less transcription & recording
	It offers numerous productivity tools besides the essential features
	AI summaries
	A budget-friendly option for teams
	High-security standards

cons

	Have more features in the free plan
	You need to install the Fellow desktop app in order to use botless recording

Jamie

Review

Transcription & recording

AI meeting notes

Collaboration features

Other capabilities

Integrations

User interface

Paid plans

Free plan

Privacy and safety

My experience

4.3

pros

	Bot-free recording
	Highly accurate real-time transcription
	Excellent AI meeting summaries with customizable templates
	Automatically extracts and organizes action items
	Ask Jamie feature
	Clean interface

cons

	Requires the desktop app to record meetings
	Lacks collaborative meeting agendas and meeting management features
	No browser-based recording option
	Not designed for organizations that need advanced security, compliance, and governance controls

Try Jamie

Key differences between Fellow and Jamie

Here is a short overview of the key differences I found in the Fellow vs Jamie showdown:

	Jamie	Fellow
Best for	Individuals and teams that want accurate AI meeting notes without meeting bots	Enterprise organizations and regulated teams (investment banking, private equity, legal) needing an AI meeting note taker with granular compliance control
Core focus	AI meeting transcription, summaries, and searchable meeting history	AI meeting assistant built with recording flexibility, team collaboration, granular data retention, and security controls
Key strengths	Bot-free recording by default Highly accurate real-time transcription Excellent AI summaries and action items Clean, distraction-free interface	Collaborative meeting agendas Bot and bot-free recording Ask Fellow across meetings and channels Strong collaboration and enterprise features Password-protected meeting recaps Data retention options (video stored, or zero-day retention
Main limitations	Lacks collaborative meeting agendas and advanced meeting management and compliance features	Free plan has limited usage User needs desktop app to use botless recording
Ease of use	Easy	Easy
Pricing	Free plan available Plus from €21/month Pro from €39/month Team from €33/user/month	Free plan: Available Team plan: $7/user/month Business plan: $15/user/month Enterprise plan: $25/user/month
Integrations	Zoom, Microsoft Teams, Google Meet, Webex, Google & Outlook Calendar, Slack, HubSpot, Trello, Monday.com, Gmail, API & webhooks	Zoom, Microsoft Teams, Google Meet, Slack, CRMs, project management tools, calendars, Claude, Glean, Global Relay
Cross-platform	Desktop (Windows & macOS)	Web / Desktop (Windows & macOS) / Mobile (Android & iOS)

The Scoring System We Used

To keep our reviews and final scores fair and consistent, we evaluate every AI note-taking tool using a standardized testing framework built on real-world usage and hands-on experience.

We evaluate every AI note-taking tool using this weighted framework, based on hands-on testing in real meetings and everyday workflows.

Our scoring breakdown after testing 20+ AI note-takers:

Features & functionality — 50%
User interface — 10%
Pricing — 20%
Security — 10%
Real-world experience — 10%

Want a detailed breakdown of how we test each category?

Learn exactly how we test tools → Review methodology

Comparison: Fellow vs Jamie

In the sections below, I’ll compare Fellow and Jamie based on my hands-on testing, covering their features, pricing, user interface, strengths, weaknesses, and the types of users each tool is best suited for.

Testing Fellow in everyday use

After using Fellow for more than a year and testing over 20 AI note-taking apps, it has become my benchmark for what a complete AI meeting assistant should look like.

It consistently delivers accurate transcriptions, detailed AI meeting summaries, and reliable action items. What really sets it apart, however, is everything that happens before and after the meeting.

In my testing, Fellow transcribed meetings with over 95% accuracy and generated AI meeting summaries within minutes. This made it easy to revisit key discussions without listening to the entire recording.

One new Fellow feature I especially liked was password-protected meeting recaps. It’s a smart security layer for anyone handling sensitive information. You get the productivity gains of automated notes and action items, but the recap itself stays locked down with a password that keeps unauthorized eyes out, and admins can enforce it workspace-wide for public recaps.

I also appreciated the flexibility of Fellow’s recording options. Whether I used bot-based or bot-free recording, it captured conversations reliably across online and in-person meetings.

Overall, Fellow delivered one of the most complete AI meeting experiences I tested.

Read my full Fellow Review: My Thoughts After +12 Months (2026)

Short on time? Here’s a quick overview of Fellow

Who should use Fellow

Teams and organizations that need a secure, scalable AI note-taking solution
Professionals with frequent meetings who want highly accurate transcriptions
Businesses that care about security and compliance (Fellow offers features like zero-day retention, a compliance portal for chief compliance officers, password-protected recaps, redaction, and more)
Users who want more than just transcription (collaboration tools, Ask Fellow, meeting agenda)
Those who value bot and bot-less recording flexibility depending on privacy needs

Who should NOT use Fellow

Users looking for a strong free plan (it feels more like a limited trial)
Users that need a cheap AI note-taker

Testing Jamie in everyday use

What I liked most about Jamie was how little it interrupted the meeting itself. Once I clicked Start Jamie, I barely had to interact with the app again. The floating transcript stayed out of the way, but it was always there if I wanted to check that everything was being transcribed correctly.

After the meeting, everything I needed was already organized. Instead of reviewing the recording myself, I could read the summary, check the action items, and ask follow-up questions through AI Chat.

When to choose Jamie

You want AI meeting notes without inviting a meeting bot to every call.
You mainly need accurate transcription, summaries, and action items rather than full meeting management.
You join meetings across different platforms or regularly attend in-person meetings.
You want to search past meetings and ask AI questions across multiple conversations.
You prefer a lightweight, distraction-free experience that’s quick to set up.

When you should skip Jamie

You need collaborative meeting agendas and shared meeting preparation.
You want built-in meeting management features like recurring agendas, feedback, and 1-on-1s.
You need a complete meeting management platform instead of an AI note-taking tool.
You’d rather use a browser-based tool instead of installing a desktop app.

Key features

Below, I’ll walk you through the features that stood out the most during my Fellow vs Jamie testing.

Fellow’s features

In this video, I will show you some of my favorite features I tried during my Fellow review.

Bot-free or bot transcription

If you choose to use a bot instead, it always requests permission to join the meeting and appears as a participant, so everyone knows the meeting is being recorded.

Based on my testing, Fellow’s transcriptions were highly accurate, around 95% or higher. They were available within a few minutes and included timestamps and speaker identification.

Security and recording controls

Fellow prioritizes enterprise-grade security with SOC 2, HIPAA, and GDPR compliance built in.

For teams that need to share summaries, password-protected recaps let you lock down meeting notes while keeping the productivity benefits of automated action items and summaries.

I also appreciated that Fellow makes clear that customer meeting data isn’t used to train AI models and remains fully under your ownership.

For organizations handling MNPI, privileged conversations, or patient data, these features move Fellow from “interesting tool” to “actually compliant solution.”

Recordings library and channels

AI meeting notes

Meeting agendas

Meeting agendas are one of Fellow’s most distinctive features because they improve meetings before they even begin.

Clips

Clips make it easy to capture and share the most important moments from a meeting without sending the entire recording.

After opening a recording, you can select the beginning and end of a clip, save it to your recordings library, or share it directly with teammates.

I also liked that Ask Fellow can generate clips for you. For example, you can ask it to create a clip of a specific customer comment, and it will find and generate that segment automatically.

Ask Fellow

Ask Fellow is much more than a chatbot. It searches the meetings and channels you have access to, even if you didn’t attend them, to answer questions using your organization’s meeting history.

Team collaboration

Integrations

Fellow integrates with the tools most teams already use, including Zoom, Microsoft Teams, Google Meet, Slack, project management platforms, CRMs, and calendars.

For regulated industries, Fellow integrates with Global Relay for compliant archiving, and with Claude for advanced workflows.

Rather than replacing your existing workflow, it connects meeting notes, recordings, and action items with the rest of your productivity stack, making follow-up work much more streamlined.

Use this link to sign up and get 10% off the paid plans if you upgrade.

Jamie’s features

Bot-free AI meeting notes

Jamie doesn’t rely on a meeting bot joining your calls. After installing the desktop app, I simply clicked ‘Start Jamie’, and it started transcribing the meeting directly from my computer.

The transcript was generated in real time as the meeting progressed, so I could follow the conversation without waiting for the recording to finish.

During my test, the transcription was highly accurate (on par with Fellow), even when multiple people were speaking, and timestamps made it easy to jump back to specific parts of the discussion.

While the meeting was running, Jamie displayed a floating transcript window that I could minimize when I needed more screen space or expand to follow the conversation. The window also included quick controls for muting the microphone and stopping the recording, so I never had to switch back to the main app.

Another feature I found useful was Scratchpad, where I could keep personal notes inside Jamie while it handled the transcription. After I stopped the recording, Jamie immediately started processing the meeting, displayed the transcription progress, and generated the meeting notes automatically.

AI summaries with customizable templates

Jamie generated an executive summary almost immediately after the recording finished. Instead of giving me a transcript to organize myself, it highlighted the main discussion points, decisions, and follow-up tasks automatically.

I also liked that the summaries weren’t limited to a single format. Jamie comes with templates for Default, Customer Discovery, Daily Standup, and Interview meetings, and it also lets you create your own.

Action item tracking

Jamie automatically pulled action items from the meeting and placed them in a dedicated Tasks section. Each task included the assignee, due date, and priority, so I could immediately see what needed to be done after the meeting.

The tasks were fully editable, which I appreciated. I could change the assignee, update the due date, adjust the priority, or remove tasks that weren’t relevant. It saved me from manually copying follow-ups into another tool before sharing them with the team.

Ask Jamie AI

Instead of searching through previous transcripts, I could ask Jamie questions in natural language.

I found this much faster than manually searching through transcripts. Even after several meetings, I could ask a question and quickly get the information I was looking for without remembering where it had originally been discussed.

Speaker identification

Jamie automatically separated the transcript by speaker, making the conversation easier to follow. During my test, it correctly identified most participants and clearly showed which speakers had already been matched.

For the two speakers it couldn’t identify, Jamie grouped their comments separately and displayed short audio clips next to each segment. I could listen to those clips, recognize the speaker, and assign the correct name in just a few clicks.

I thought this was a thoughtful touch that made correcting speaker labels much faster than manually searching through the transcript.

Searchable meeting workspace

Jamie stores every meeting in a searchable workspace. I could browse previous meetings, open participant profiles in the People tab, organize conversations with Tags, and review meetings that had been shared with me.

Integrations

Jamie works with the most popular meeting platforms, including Zoom, Microsoft Teams, Google Meet, and Webex. If you connect your Google Calendar or Outlook Calendar, it can automatically detect upcoming meetings and prepare them for recording.

Beyond meetings, Jamie integrates with Slack, HubSpot, Trello, Monday.com, Gmail, and Outlook. Teams with more advanced automation needs can also connect Jamie through its API and webhooks, including workflows built with Zapier or Make.

Try Jamie

Plans & value

Fellow’s cost breakdown

The Business plan starts with 3 users and provides unlimited recordings, transcription minutes, organization-wide meeting templates, sales AI recap templates, and more integrations.

The Enterprise plan offers advanced control, security, and AI meeting support. With this plan, you can create customized rules for recording and have more recordings and transcription minutes.

Explore our Apps directory

A curated directory of software tools we’ve independently reviewed, with links to full reviews, comparisons, and category guides.

Explore Apps directory

Jamie’s cost breakdown

Jamie offers a free plan alongside four paid tiers.

The free plan includes 10 AI meeting notes and transcripts per month, with meetings of up to 30 minutes. Despite the usage limits, it still includes core features like AI summaries, action item detection, speaker recognition, Ask Jamie, calendar integrations, and unlimited storage.

Plus starts is €21/month when billed annually and increases the limits to 20 meetings per month with meetings of up to 2 hours. Pro costs €39/month with annual billing and removes the meeting cap while increasing the maximum meeting length to 3 hours. It also adds CRM integrations, unlimited templates, Asana integration, MCP support, and priority support.

The Team plan is €33 per month per seat with annual billing (min 2 seats), and adds shared workspaces, centralized billing, and admin features, while Enterprise offers custom pricing with SSO, advanced security controls, and dedicated onboarding for larger organizations.

User interface

Fellow’s user interface

Fellow has a simple and clean user interface. It’s particularly great that you can access many features from the homepage with just a few clicks.

I used this tool’s desktop version, which you can easily download from Fellow’s website. The desktop app helps you make the meeting experience smooth from beginning to end.

Use this link to sign up and get 10% off the paid plans if you upgrade.

Jamie’s user interface

Jamie has one of the cleanest interfaces I’ve seen in an AI meeting assistant. The layout is simple, and I had no trouble finding my way around.

I also liked that the recording controls stayed in a small floating window instead of taking over my screen. It let me follow the live transcript, minimize it when I needed more space, and stop the recording without interrupting the meeting.

Try Jamie

Pros and cons of Fellow

Pros of Fellow

You can choose whether you want bot-free or bot meeting recordings
Enterprise-grade security (offers privacy controls and never trains on your data)
Offers transcript redaction
Robust integrations with project management and CRM tools
MCP Server (integration with LLMs like ChatGPT, Claude, and Perplexity)
API for custom workflows
Very accurate real-time transcription
It offers numerous productivity tools like pre-meeting briefs, meeting agendas, Ask Fellow, and AI note templates, besides the essential features
The AI summaries are super helpful and include all the relevant points
A budget-friendly option for teams

Cons of Fellow

You need to install the Fellow desktop app in order to use botless recording

Pros and cons of Jamie

Jamie pros

Bot-free recording that keeps meetings private
Highly accurate real-time transcription
Well-structured AI summaries with customizable meeting templates
Automatically extracts and organizes action items
Ask Jamie AI can answer questions across multiple meetings
Smart speaker identification with audio clips for quick manual correction
Clean, intuitive interface
Works with virtually any meeting platform through desktop audio capture

Jamie cons

Desktop app is required to record meetings
Lacks collaborative meeting agenda and meeting management tools

Alternatives to Fellow and Jamie

If you are not sure if Jamie and Fellow are the best choice for you, here are some:

App	Best for	Description
Notta	Best for multi-language transcription	A unique AI note-taker that allows multi-language transcription, enabling people to speak two different languages during online meetings. Full Notta review \| Quick Notta overview
Fathom	Best free AI note-taker	An accurate AI note-taker with an extensive free plan. Full Fathom review \| Quick Fathom overview
MeetGeek	Best for multi-language transcription	A versatile AI note-taking app with the best AI meeting summaries. Full MeetGeek review \| Quick MeetGeek overview
tl;dv	Best simple AI note-taker	A simple option for individuals with a feature-rich free plan. Full tl;dv review \| Quicktl;dv overview
Radiant	Best free AI note-taker for Mac	It is a 100% free AI bot-less note-taker for Mac users for in-person and online meetings. Full Radiant review \| Quick Radiant overview
Otter AI	A popular AI note-taker	One of the most popular AI note-takers for Google Meet, Zoom, and Microsoft Teams. Full Otter AI review \| Quick Otter AI overview
Granola	Best for users need a simple bot-less AI note-taker	Granola is a lightweight AI note-taking app that transcribes and summarizes meetings without bots, with a generous free tier, but it’s basic and lacks advanced features. Full Granola review \| Quick Granola overview
Krisp	Best bot-less AI note-taker supporting high audio quality	Krisp is a Voice AI platform for clearer communication and more productive meetings, combining real-time audio enhancements with AI note-taking. Full Krisp review \| Quick Krisp overview
Bluedot	An easy-to-use bot-less AI note-taker	Bluedot is a straightforward and easy-to-use bot-free AI note-taker. Full Bluedot review \| Quick Bluedot overview
Zoom AI Companion	Best for Zoom users needing built-in AI note-taking	A solid built-in AI assistant for Zoom that offers meeting summaries, basic transcription, and action items, but lacks advanced features. Full Zoom AI Companion review \| Quick Zoom AI Companion overview

My pick: Fellow vs Jamie

After testing both tools, my pick in this Fellow vs Jamie comparison is Fellow.

It simply offers much more than AI meeting notes. The option to choose between bot and bot-free recording is another advantage that makes it suitable for a wider range of workflows.

Jamie, on the other hand, is an excellent AI note-taker. If your priority is accurate transcription, bot-free recording, and a clean, distraction-free experience, it’s one of the best options I’ve tested. It just doesn’t offer the same meeting management and collaboration features that make Fellow stand out.

Looking for similar tools?

Visit our AI note-takers library to explore other apps we’ve reviewed in this space and how they compare.

See overview

Why you can trust our reviews

Our mission? No fluff, no shortcuts—just honest, hands-on insights from productivity pros.

Discover how we stay transparent, read our review methodology, and let us know about any tools we missed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better: Fellow or Jamie?

Fellow is the better choice if you’re looking for a secure AI meeting note taker with collaborative agendas, meeting preparation, action item tracking, and extensive integrations. Jamie, on the other hand, is better suited for users who primarily want accurate AI meeting notes, bot-free recording, and AI-powered conversation summaries with minimal setup.

What is the biggest difference between Fellow and Jamie?

The biggest difference is their focus. Fellow combines AI meeting notes with meeting management and security features like collaborative agendas, pre-meeting briefs, password-protected recaps, a compliance portal for IT and chief compliance officers, and team collaboration. Jamie focuses on recording meetings without a bot, generating accurate transcripts, AI summaries, and helping users search past conversations through Ask Jamie AI.

Does Jamie integrate with Outlook and other business tools?

Yes. Jamie integrates with Google Calendar and Microsoft Outlook to automatically detect upcoming meetings. It also supports integrations with business tools such as Slack, HubSpot, Trello, and Monday.com, while API and webhook support allow additional automation through platforms like Zapier and Make.

Which tool offers better integrations?

Fellow offers broader integrations overall. In addition to Zoom, Microsoft Teams, Google Meet, Slack, and calendar apps, it connects with CRM systems, project management platforms, archiving tools, and productivity tools to help teams manage meeting notes, action items, and follow-up work. Jamie supports the most common meeting and business integrations but is more focused on AI note-taking than workflow management.

Is Jamie or Fellow better for business teams?

For most business teams, especially teams in private equity, hedge funds, investment banking, legal, and other regulated industries, Fellow is the stronger choice because it combines AI meeting notes with security and compliance, collaboration, meeting preparation, shared agendas, and organization-wide workflows. Jamie works well for individuals and smaller teams that want accurate AI meeting notes and searchable conversation history without adding a meeting bot to every call.